From Start-Up to Industry Leader: Casey Kempton’s Trailblazing Career

By Michaela Platt, Communications Coordinator, Triple-I

As businesses started incorporating Internet strategies into their operations, Casey Kempton had just begun her graduate studies in cognitive anthropology and was working for a tech startup. A Connecticut native, Kempton had always been aware of insurance giants based in her state.

So, when the startup she worked for went out of business, a career with their insurance partner, The Hartford, seemed a natural fit. She applied for a position in their e-business ventures unit and has worked in roles across the insurance industry ever since.

“When I first came into the industry, learning about exactly what our product does and how it benefits consumers, I had this sense that both agents and consumers could expect more from their carriers,” said Kempton, who is now president of personal lines at Nationwide.

To Kempton, this meant thinking about preventing or minimizing claims, in addition to optimizing the end-to-end experience with the product. The curiosity and drive for innovation that marked Kempton’s early career propelled her to patent two home insurance risk rating solutions.

“A small group of us wanted to take the concept of early telematics and figure out – if and when the internet was pervasive and everything was connected, as they were predicting,” Kempton said. “In this future model, how could it impact real-time rating, monitoring, and response?”

Kempton leads all aspects of the business, including product, underwriting, sales and distribution, claims and services. She previously was executive vice president and digital business officer at Chubb and spent time with ACE Group, accountable for global personal and commercial lines and leading operations and information technology for Latin America.

The result was a product Kempton helped create while still in her early twenties :a closed-loop system that senses, underwrites, and prices risk in real time while also offering remediation services. The system has now been patented for nearly 20 years.

Despite this promising start, Kempton faced obstacles in this traditionally male-dominated field. Even as she rose into leadership roles, some challenges persisted.

“There are times where I may have traveled to visit agents or partners in different parts of the country and realized that expectations on the roles that women could hold versus men were quite different,” she said. “I had several experiences where it was assumed I was the note-taker for the meeting when, in fact, I was the boss or the most senior person there.”

Despite the challenges, Kempton has found her career as a woman in leadership to be incredibly rewarding and is thankful for the mentorship and sponsorship along the way.

“I had two really important mentor-sponsors in my career, both of whom were men, both of whom created opportunities for me that, on my own, I might have struggled to have,” she said.

Kempton has worked to form alliances and a support structure with both men and women in the industry. She has also found herself in stages of her career where she was without a mentor and had to network and build new relationships. She emphasizes the importance of leaning into common ground and building bonds with coworkers while also establishing practices that amplify all voices at the table.

“If you contribute something and then one of your male counterparts takes credit for it five minutes later, nobody says anything,” she said. “Everybody heard you and they know you said it, but we don’t have a practice of saying, ‘Right, that’s the idea Casey just shared. Thank you for pointing that out.’”

Kempton said a lot of bright, capable, driven women assert themselves – only to be  labeled “difficult”, “aggressive”, and “hard to work with”. That is something she has coached a lot of women on through her career.

Kempton also addressed the pay gap, and the unspoken penalties women face for taking time off to have children.

“I still have these stress dreams,” she said. “I know I’m stressed about something when I have this dream, and it’s that I’m pregnant again. And my goodness, what is that going to do to the rest of my career? How am I going to manage that? To me, this correlates to the pay challenge because my career paused with the birth of each of my children.”

Kempton is passionate about addressing the pay gap in the insurance industry, but recognizes that there is no easy answer.

“Each manager must make a personal commitment to say, ‘I can’t tell them how underpaid they are, but I can work to fix it over time,’” she said. “We need to work to fix it every year until men and women are on par. We need to create awareness with managers, that they have some control over how we address that pay gap.”

Meanwhile, women executives like Casey Kempton continue to break barriers. Her journey highlights the power of innovation, perseverance, and the importance of mentorship and allyship. From her early days at The Hartford to her leadership role at Nationwide, Kempton’s story is a testament to the impact one person can have.

“For me, leadership has been incredibly rewarding,” said Kempton. “The best advice I can give to young women starting out is to be curious. Expose yourself early on to as much as you can contextually and then become an expert in something. Being more intentional about how you navigate where you want to go, that’s when you’ll go far.”

How Tariffs Affect
P&C Insurance Prospects

Tariffs and threats of tariffs have been roiling financial markets since January. Property and casualty insurers are no less concerned, as the cost of repairing and replacing damaged property is a driver of claim costs and, ultimately, policyholder premiums.

Triple-I Chief Economist and Data Scientist Dr. Michel Léonard recently sat down to explain the implications of tariffs and trade barriers for insurers and what economic considerations concern industry decisionmakers.

While property and casualty insurers write many kinds of coverage, the lines Léonard primarily discussed were homeowners and personal and commercial auto – “lines that have a physical emphasis on repair, rebuild, and replace.”

Lumber from Canada; cars, trucks, and parts from Canada and Mexico; and garments, furnishings, and technology from Asia all come into play when considering the prospective impacts of tariffs on replacement costs, Léonard said.

“When we’re focusing specifically on China,” he said, “we’re looking primarily at farm equipment and alternative-energy components.”

Uncertainty around tariffs – particularly in recent weeks, as tariffs on Mexico and Canada have been imposed and “paused” – makes analysis even more difficult.

“Much depends on how much clarity there is, how much communication from the policymakers, from the administration and from the legislature,” Léonard said. It’s also important to remember that impacts can last well beyond their implementation and withdrawal.

During the first Trump Administration, tariffs on soft commodities, beef, grain, and so forth had impacts for several years afterwards.

“Those tariffs were fairly short lived,” Léonard said, “but for two to three years afterward farmers were uncomfortable investing in equipment at the same pace, and that reduced farmowners’ insurance growth.”

Regardless of how the current discussions around tariffs play out, the Trump Administration has signaled a decided shift in policy toward greater protectionism. As a result, Léonard said, “We should expect a repositioning in our understanding of our replacement costs and underlying growth forecast for the next 12 months, at a minimum.”

He projects a period of “most likely 24 to 36 months” in which growth will be slower and inflation – including replacement costs for the P&C industry – will be higher.

Learn More:

Tariffs and Insurance – full video (Members Only)

Insurance Economic Outlook (Members Only)

What Florida’s Misguided Investigation Means
for Georgia Tort Reform

In an eblast to members and other stakeholders, Triple-I highlighted the growing need for tort reform in Georgia and the expanding movement in Florida threatening to undo the positive 2022 and 2023 reforms that have stabilized the Sunshine State’s insurance market and driven down prices for consumers and business owners.

March 24 marks two years since Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed HB 837, the second of two impactful tort reform bills tackling Florida’s lawsuit crisis that pushed the insurance market to the edge. According to National Association of Insurance Commissioners data, Florida accounted for just over 8% of U.S. homeowners insurance claims, but more than 76% of U.S. property claim lawsuits in 2019 before critical reforms were enacted. All of which is proof of a system in disarray.

A recent commentary written by Jerry Theodorou, director of the Finance, Insurance and Trade Policy Program at R Street Institute, highlighted vast improvements in Florida’s property insurance market due to legislative reform:

  •  Lawsuit filings dropped by 40% year-over-year.
  • Average home insurance premiums have decreased 5.6%.
  • 11 new property insurers entered the market.

Despite these clear signs of progress, a misguided Florida House investigation, which began last week, has been fueling misleading narratives about tort reform, just as Georgia lawmakers are considering critical legal system reforms in the Peach State.

Critics in Florida claim insurers illegally diverted funds to managing general agents and affiliates while dismissing the well-documented role of lawsuit abuse in driving up costs. This was based on a draft report about the financial operations of Florida insurers that the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation chose not to distribute because it was misleading.  

This same rhetoric is now infiltrating the Georgia Capitol in Atlanta, where some are arguing that Florida lawmakers were duped into passing reforms in 2022 and 2023. In truth, Florida’s risk crisis stems from rampant legal system abuse, a factor that has increased insurance premiums for everyone.

Even with the distorted narrative trial lawyers are inflicting on Florida lawmakers, Gov. DeSantis stated he would not support any legislation that would increase lawsuits against insurers. A recent opinion piece written by Florida insurance agent Allen McGinniss further highlights the reality of the Florida insurance market, explaining that the false narrativethat the insurance industry, not lawsuit abuse, is driving high costs for consumers “is not just inaccurate — it’s reckless.”

In Georgia, the negative rhetoric coming from neighboring Florida must not delay progress that has already been made in the 2025 General Assembly to put an end to legal system abuse in the Peach State.

Tort reform is essential to curbing lawsuit abuse, stabilizing markets, and protecting businesses and consumers in Georgia. Lawmakers cannot fall for the same tactics the trial bar in Florida designed to stall much-needed legal system reforms for many years. Following passage by the Georgia Senate, the House must act now to pass these crucial tort reform bills and send them to Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk to sign into law.

Both Florida and Georgia are at a pivotal moment in civil justice reform. Legal system abuse has generated increased insurance costs in both states, fueling social inflation and placing a heavier financial burden on families and business owners. The stakes are too high to let trial lawyers and bad actors manipulate legislators into reversing progress or blocking much-needed reforms.

Florida lawmakers must stay the course to ensure the successful legal reforms over the past few years remain intact, while Georgia legislators must seize this opportunity to pass meaningful legal system changes. These actions are essential to decreasing lawsuit abuse, stabilizing insurance markets, and protecting consumers and businesses from rising costs.

Go deeper:

  • For more in-depth analysis on legal system abuse and social inflation, visit Triple-I’s knowledge hub and StopLegalSystemAbuse.org microsite.
  • Discover more about the impact of legal system abuse in Florida and Georgia by reading Triple-I’s latest Florida and Georgia Issues Briefs.

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Recent improvement in Florida’s insurance market – fostered by legislation targeting legal system abuse – is threatened by several bills proposed in the state’s 2025 legislative session.

Florida’s property insurance market has stabilized thanks to reforms introduced in 2022 and 2023 aimed at reducing excessive litigation and inflated claims. As a result of these reforms, the number of insurers writing business in the state has rebounded after a multi-year exodus. This competition has allowed policyholders to leave Citizens Property Insurance Corp. – the state-run insurer of last resort – to obtain coverage at rates that were previously unavailable.

According to the Florida Chamber of Commerce, key bills threatening policyholders’ savings include:

  • H.B. 451/SB 554, which would reintroduce litigation incentives;
  • H.B. 947/SB 1520, which would eliminate transparency requirements for medical costs in court;
  • H.B. 1437/SB 1840, which would reinstate attorney fee awards in auto insurance cases; and
  • H.B. 1551/SB 426, which would bring back attorney fees for property insurance lawsuits that were eliminated in 2022.

Before recent reforms, Florida homeowners paid premiums up to three times the national average. Since the reforms, 60 percent of the top 10 national insurers writing homeowners insurance in Florida have expanded their business over the past year, and 40 percent of all insurers operating in the state filed for rate decreases in 2024, according to Florida Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworksy.

As Triple-I CEO Sean Kevelighan recently put it, “Citizens of the Sunshine State are now clearly seeing the benefits of a more stable and affordable insurance marketplace.”

The new legislation would reduce or even reverse that progress.

Learn More:

Florida Reforms Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize 

Florida’s Progress in Legal Reform: A Model for 2025

How Georgia Might Learn From Florida Reforms

Resilience Investments Paid Off in Florida During Hurricane Milton

Florida Homeowners Premium Growth Slows as Reforms Take Hold, Inflation Cools

Louisiana’s Insurance Woes Worsen as Florida Works to Fix Its Problems

US Cyber Claims Surge While Global Rates Decline: Chubb

Cyber Security Data Protection Business Technology Privacy concept.

Cyber insurance claims are showing alarming trends in both frequency and severity, with U.S. businesses experiencing particularly steep increases while markets outside the U.S. show declining rates, according to a report from Chubb.

The comprehensive claims analysis, based on Chubb’s cyber claims data through December 2024, reveals critical insights about ransomware incidents driving claim severity, privacy-related liability becoming increasingly complex, and widespread cyber events contributing to rising frequency—all factors that are fundamentally reshaping the cyber risk landscape for businesses of all sizes.

U.S. Market Trends

The cyber insurance landscape in the U.S. continues to evolve at a concerning pace, with both frequency and severity of claims showing upward trajectories over the past three years. While claim frequency remains below the peak levels observed in 2020-2021, severity has increased significantly from 2020 through 2024, with notable volatility in recent years, Chubb reported.

Particularly alarming is the sharp increase in claim severity for mid-sized companies with revenues of $100 million to $999 million, and large companies with revenues exceeding $1 billion. These organizations have experienced substantial losses that have made headlines across business media. Interestingly, many of these attacks weren’t the result of sophisticated malware evading robust cybersecurity systems, but rather social engineering attacks targeting IT help desks and involving SIM card swaps in mobile phones, according to the report.

Another troubling trend is the rise in widespread cyber events—incidents that simultaneously affect numerous companies. These events, which can stem from attacks, software malfunctions or human error, increased to 5.3% of total reported claims in 2024, up from 4.0% in 2023, contributing significantly to the overall frequency of cyber claims.

International Market Contrast

The cyber risk scenario outside the U.S. tells a markedly different story. International markets are experiencing declining trends in both the frequency and severity of cyber claims. For medium and large revenue accounts outside the U.S., severity has decreased over the past three years, while small revenue accounts have seen only modest increases in severity, Chubb reported.

This divergence can be attributed to several factors. International businesses have increased cyber risk awareness at executive and board levels, improved business continuity planning, developed more robust incident response protocols, and focused on compliance with new regulatory frameworks such as the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act.

Perhaps most striking is the difference in ransom payment behavior. The willingness to pay ransoms is substantially lower outside the U.S., with only 8% of companies paying ransoms in 2024 compared to 35% of U.S.-based companies. This trend has remained consistent over the past five years, Chubb reported.

Notable Claims Statistics

The financial impact of cyber incidents continues to grow, with ransomware remaining the primary driver of losses. In 2023 and 2024, ransomware-related losses accounted for nearly 72% of all cyber claim dollars, up from an average of 63% between 2020 and 2022. The frequency of subsequent third-party litigation from ransomware incidents has also increased dramatically, up approximately 75% in 2024 compared to the 2020-2021 average.

The July 2024 CrowdStrike incident provides a sobering example of how non-malicious events can cause widespread disruption, the report noted. When the cybersecurity company CrowdStrike sent a faulty software update to customers worldwide, it resulted in 8.5 million systems crashing and generated between $400 million and $1.5 billion in insured losses, the report stated.

This incident highlighted that system failures can be as devastating as malicious attacks, underscoring the importance of comprehensive incident response planning and resilience measures. Organizations with strong resilience capabilities in place were better positioned to weather this unexpected disruption, reinforcing the value of preparedness in today’s interconnected digital ecosystem, according to Chubb.

Evolution of Privacy-Related Claims

As digital footprints expand and consumer awareness grows, privacy-related claims have emerged as a significant concern for businesses across the U.S. Recent data reveals a troubling trend: the proportion of third-party claims related to privacy liability has doubled in 2023-24 compared to 2020-22. This surge reflects not only heightened consumer awareness but also the evolving regulatory environment that has created new avenues for litigation, the report explained.

Three key regulatory frameworks are primarily driving this increase in U.S. privacy claims, Chubb reported:

  • The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) has become particularly impactful, regulating how companies collect, use, and handle biometric identifiers and information.
  • The Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) has gained renewed relevance in the digital age. This law directly addresses how companies implement and use pixels—those tiny snippets of code embedded in websites that track user behavior.
  • State-level wiretapping laws have also contributed to the privacy claims landscape. The California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), for instance, provides individuals with a private right of action against businesses for privacy violations, with potential statutory damages reaching $5,000 per violation—a figure that can quickly escalate to significant amounts in class action scenarios.

Beyond U.S. borders, international privacy regulations continue to reshape how global businesses approach data handling and privacy compliance. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) stands as the gold standard, comprehensively regulating the lawful collection, processing, use, retention and deletion of personally identifiable information.

View the full report here.

Women continue to hold 59 percent of the insurance workforce, with representation among underwriters increasing by 5 percent.

On March 3, Triple-I released its Chart of the Week, “Women’s Representation Among Underwriters Increased.” Citing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the chart reveals that the number of women insurance Underwriters increased by 5 percent from 56.9 percent to 61.9 percent in 2024.

The insurance sector provided about 3.0 million jobs–or 1.9 percent of U.S. employment (workers 16 years and over) in 2024. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates that 1.7 million workers were women.  Since 2012, women have comprised about the same overall proportion (about 59 percent) of the industry workforce each year. However, the latest COTW shows that representation continues to vary across occupations. From 2023 to 2024, women’s representation among Insurance Clerks decreased 1.4 percent, from 80.1 percent to 78.7 percent. Representation among Insurance Sales Agents decreased 3.8 percent, from 54.9 percent to 51.1 percent.

The average representation of women across the U.S. workforce is 47 percent based on data from households in the Current Population Survey (CPS), an annual survey of business establishments in private industry conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 

Life insurance, annuities, and home and auto insurance sectors are considerably more gender diverse than the average industry in North America, especially in entry-level jobs, where women make up two-thirds of the 70% of entry-level workers. In contrast to the abundance of representation at the bottom, the view across the top ranks looks notably different. Only about 22 percent (less than 1 in 4) of workers in the C-Suite are women, and only two women CEOs head up Fortune 500 insurance companies: Thasunda Brown Duckett, President and Chief Executive Officer of TIAA, and Tricia Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Progressive Group of Insurance Companies.

Nonetheless, women continue to demonstrate their skills, willingness to grow, and ability to influence the insurance industry in a positive and forward-thinking way.  According to McKinsey, for every 100 men promoted to managerial positions, 104 women are promoted — much higher than the 87 women promoted across all industries. At the board level, women hold 40 percent of the seats in the aforementioned industry sectors.

However, from entry-level to managerial level, the women in the industry are predominantly white, with the leadership pipeline remaining even more closed off to women of color. Only one in 20 senior vice presidents and one in 35 direct reports to CEOs in insurance are women of color.  Black women comprise more than 7 percent of the entry-level insurance workforce, but this number plummets along the corporate ladder and falls to virtually zero at the C-suite.

There’s evidence that women as workers in the insurance industry go back a long way, as far back as 1797. Their tremendous impact on the industry as consumers likely pivoted in 1839 with individual American states passing the Married Women’s Property Act, allowing life insurance proceeds to be passed to a widow without being subject to the demands of the husband’s debtors. By 1942, women accounted for 30% of total life insurance sales, and just two years later, women were buying 83% more life insurance than they did in 1942.

Today, keeping risk management solutions easily accessible and tailored to the market’s needs is arguably the biggest core challenge facing insurers. Research indicates that female CEOs among U.S. property-casualty insurance companies are associated with “lower insurer insolvency propensity, higher z-score, and lower standard deviation of return on assets.”  Additionally, data suggested that as consumers, women tend to spend comparatively more of their income on insurance and have different consumer behavioral preferences that may compel a rethinking of insurance value chains.

Thus, insurers may discover that fostering an inclusive culture that welcomes more women into leadership can be a faster path to successful outcomes. Join us at the upcoming JIF 2025 event and follow our blog for more insights on the future of insurance.

Florida Reforms
Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize 

Florida’s legislative reforms to address claim fraud and legal system abuse are stabilizing the state’s property/casualty insurance market, according to the latest Triple-I Issues Brief.  

Claims-related litigation has significantly declined over the past two years, and premium averages are nearly flat, with several insurers requesting rate decreases from the state’s insurance regulator.  In addition, the brief says, the number of insurers writing business in the state has rebounded after a multi-year exodus. This competition from the private market has allowed policyholders to leave Citizens Property Insurance Corp. – the state-run insurer of last resort – to obtain coverage at previously unavailable rates from a much healthier private market. 

According to the state’s Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR), Florida in 2022 accounted for nearly 71 percent of the nation’s homeowners claim-related litigation, despite representing only 15 percent of homeowners insurance claims. The same year – before Hurricane Ian made landfall in Florida – six insurers in the state declared insolvency, primarily due to economic pressures from legal system abuse. Based on insured losses, Ian became the second-most costly U.S. hurricane on record, due in large part to extraordinary litigation costs for disputed claims. 

The Legislature responded to the growing crisis by passing several pieces of insurance reform that, among other things, eliminated one-way attorney fees and assignment of benefits (AOB) for property insurance claims and prohibited misleading legal service ads and the misuse of consumer health information for legal services. 

Premium rate growth slowing 

The impact of the 2022 and 2023 reforms can be seen in premium rate changes, particularly with respect to homeowners insurance. Homeowners rates in Florida grew at a much slower rate in 2024, even as rate growth remained strong nationally. Growth in personal auto insurance premium rates in Florida has slowed since the repeal of AOB and one-way attorney fees, but the trend also is consistent with nationwide experience. 

“There are a lot of factors involved in insurance rates, and Florida’s property and auto markets are challenging,” Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said in February, “but…data suggests that, in 2024, Florida had the lowest average homeowners’ premium increases in the nation, and the overall market has stabilized, with 11 new companies having entered the market over the past two years.” 

Among the top 10 national insurers writing homeowners insurance in Florida, 60 percent have expanded their business over the past year, and 40 percent of all insurers operating in the state filed for rate decreases in 2024, according to Florida Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworksy. 

The cost of reinsurance also continues to decrease for Florida carriers. 

“In 2024, most companies paid less for reinsurance than they did in 2023,” according to the OIR website. “The average risk-adjusted cost for 2024 was -0.7 percent, a large reduction from last year’s change of 27 percent increase from the prior year.” 

Reinsurance costs are factored into premium rates, so this is another reason Florida now has the lowest average rate filings in the United States in 2024, according to S&P Global Marketplace. 

Learn More: 

Florida’s Progress in Legal Reform: A Model for 2025 

How Georgia Might Learn From Florida Reforms 

Resilience Investments Paid Off in Florida During Hurricane Milton 

Florida Homeowners Premium Growth Slows as Reforms Take Hold, Inflation Cools