Category Archives: Insurers and the Economy

Homeowners Insurance, Insurance Industry, Insurers and the Economy, Specialty Coverage

LGBTQIA+ Homeownership Gap May Be Fueling Insurance Protection Gap

Leave a comment
Chart of the Week (COTW), As Fewer Same-Sex Couples Own Their Dwelling, They Face a Larger Insurance Protection Gap. The homeownership gap for same-sex couple households is 25.2% based on the most recent data.
The homeownership gap for same-sex couple households is 25.2% based on the most recent data.

As part of an ongoing discussion on the link between the housing and insurance markets, the Insurance Information Institute (Triple-I) released a Chart of the Week (COTW), “As Fewer Same-Sex Couples Own Their Dwelling, They Face a Larger Insurance Protection Gap.” Based on data from 2023, 62.6 percent of same-sex households own their homes and 37.4 percent rent, representing a homeownership gap of 25.2 percentage points within this community. In comparison, 82 percent of married opposite-sex households own their homes, while only 18 percent rent.

In the United States, homeownership offers several benefits (versus renting) to those with the financial resources to achieve and sustain it. Owners can accrue equity to increase their chances of making a profit when they sell their home. They can reap tax benefits through mortgage deductions. Mortgage holders can also lower monthly housing costs when interest rates drop. Ultimately, a home can increase personal net worth and offer a mechanism to transfer wealth to the next generation. Protecting this asset and its contents makes good financial sense.

Renters may not own their dwelling, but they keep personal belongings in it. They can face serious financial risks in the event of a loss, theft, disaster, or personal liability event. Yet, according to the COTW, 43 percent of renters are uninsured or underinsured, compared to 30 percent of homeowners. There are several reasons attributable to this difference, but it’s essential to keep one at the forefront: insurance coverage requirements are commonplace in mortgage agreements but not in lease agreements. Thus, homeownership status can drive participation in the insurance market.

Examining factors that impede homeownership for same-sex couples might shed light on how to attract and retain more policyholders in this demographic. Looking closely at the interplay of just three of these – housing prices, geography, and legislative environment – reveals that housing tends to be more expensive in LGBTQIA+-friendly areas. Prospective buyers may need to earn at least $150,000 a year – as much as 50 percent more – to avoid living in regions without basic legal protections, according to a recent study of real estate market data across 54 major U.S. metropolitan areas.

High monthly housing costs strain budgets, pushing homeowners and renters out of the insurance market. It can also put the financial qualifications for home buying – i.e., building credit and savings – out of reach. Households are considered cost-burdened when they spend more than 30 percent of their income on rent, mortgage payments, and other housing costs, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Nationwide, renters had higher median housing costs as a percentage of their income (31.0 percent) compared to homeowners (21.1 percent for homeowners with a mortgage and 11.5 percent for those without a mortgage). In metropolitan areas that welcome and protect diversity, renters are more likely to be housing cost-burdened, particularly in New York (52.1 percent of residents pay more than 30 percent of their income) and San Francisco (37.6 percent of residents). Renters in states and municipalities where legislation is considerably less welcoming but rents are lower can face comparatively higher premiums for rental coverage.

Despite the legalization of same-sex marriage and various anti-discrimination laws, the LGBTQ community still battles considerable discrimination and systemic biases in many areas of life, including housing. Insurers can work to better understand the diverse needs of LGBTQIA+ individuals, couples, and their families, facilitating more effective solutions for managing financial risks. And most importantly, the industry can improve communication around potential coverage benefits for these households.

“We can start closing the protection gap by having people at the table who understand the lived experiences behind the numbers,” says Amy Cole-Smith, Executive Director for BIIC/ Director of Diversity at The Institutes.

For example, renters might find it helpful to know their policy covers a loss event linked to discrimination against them, such as malicious damage or vandalism to the property by a third party. Even when it’s evident the destruction isn’t the renter’s fault, the landlord might still attempt to hold them responsible, either through a lawsuit, a rent increase, or eviction. Additionally, unmarried couples should be informed about whether the insurer includes both partners’ names on a policy and how this provision affects them in the event of a claim.

“Cultivating an inclusive workforce drives smarter solutions, like renters’ insurance that aligns with the realities of same-sex couples, more equitable underwriting, and marketing that truly resonates,” Cole-Smith says. “This isn’t just about equity—it’s about unlocking growth and staying competitive in a changing market. When the insurance workforce reflects the diversity of the market, we’re in a stronger position to build products that meet people where they are.”

Triple-I works to advance the conversation around crucial issues in the insurance industry, including Talent and Recruitment. To join the discussion, register for JIF 2025. We also invite you to follow our blog to learn more about trends in insurance affordability and availability across the property/casualty market.

Auto Insurance, Business Insurance, Business Risk, Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Market Conditions, Wildfire

P&C Insurance Achieves Best Results Since 2013; Wildfire Losses, Tariffs Threaten 2025 Prospects

Leave a comment

By William Nibbelin, Senior Research Actuary, Triple-I

The U.S. P&C insurance industry’s financial outcomes for 2024 revealed a net combined ratio (NCR) of 96.6, demonstrating a substantial 5.1-point enhancement compared to the prior year and representing the sector’s most favorable underwriting performance since 2013, as detailed in a recent report by Triple-I and Milliman.

However, this progress faces potential impediments. The economic repercussions from early 2025 California wildfire losses, in conjunction with the unfolding influence of tariff policies, introduce factors that could dampen the industry’s performance throughout 2025 and possibly counterbalance the recent positive trajectory.

Noteworthy 2024 performance indicators:

  • The disparity in profitability between personal and commercial lines diminished, with both segments achieving an NCR below 100 for the year.
  • Personal auto insurers reported a 2024 NCR of 95.3, marking a considerable 9.6-point year-over-year improvement. This advancement was largely attributable to robust net written premium (NWP) expansion, with growth rates of 14.4 percent in 2023 and 12.8 percent in 2024.
  • Homeowners’ insurance experienced an 11.2-point improvement from 2023, as reflected in a 2024 NCR of 99.7. This represents the first instance of an NCR below 100 since 2019. Furthermore, the NWP growth rate reached 13.6 percent, surpassing the 12.4 percent growth observed in 2023 and achieving the highest level in over 15 years.

Impending challenges and market pressures:

  • The general liability segment is encountering increased financial strain, as evidenced by the least favorable NCR since 2016 and the third worst since 2010.
  • Early forecasts for the first quarter of 2025 suggest that the P&C industry may face its most challenging first-quarter results in over 15 years due to the extensive losses from the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires.
  • The imposition of tariffs, effective as of early May 2025, is beginning to exert pressure on fundamental growth metrics and is contributing to the escalation of replacement costs across various insurance lines, initially with personal auto, and subsequently affecting homeowners and renters, commercial auto, and commercial property.  

Economic dynamics and trends

Triple-I’s chief economist and data scientist, Michel Léonard, Ph.D., CBE, pointed out that P&C underlying economic growth in 2025 has doubled the growth of the U.S. GDP, with the former at 5 percent and the latter at 2.5 percent year-over-year.  

In addition, it is anticipated that P&C replacement costs will not increase as quickly as the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI), with projected rates of 1.0 percent, compared to 2.0 percent year over year.  

However, Léonard offered a cautionary perspective, stating, “While P&C economic drivers continue to outperform the broader U.S. economy—with stronger growth and lower replacement cost inflation—we now anticipate a shift in 2025 due to ongoing and expanded tariffs”.  

He further elaborated on the potential adverse effects of tariffs: “These headwinds are expected to slow the sector’s momentum, potentially leading to a contraction later in the year that could exceed the overall GDP slowdown. Additionally, replacement costs, initially projected to rise more slowly than CPI, may accelerate and begin to outpace it, adding further pressure. Even though rising costs may lead to additional premium increases, these will likely be insufficient to offset slowing consumer spending and corporate investment.”

He explained how the timing of tariff impacts is staggered due to inventory management behavior, with the full effect of current tariffs yet to be realized.

Underwriting context and projections

Dale Porfilio, Chief Insurance Officer at Triple-I, attributes the notable 2024 turnaround in personal lines to the hard market conditions that allowed for necessary premium adjustments, rather than a decrease in incurred losses, which remained nearly flat. However, some upward pressure on the combined ratio is expected for 2025, reflecting tariff impacts and increased acquisition expenses. A deeper look into personal auto trends reveals that physical damage loss ratios have been improving rapidly, while liability coverage improvements have plateaued, raising concerns about legal system abuse and liability coverage responsiveness.

Homeowners’ insurance improvements were also driven primarily by premium increases, though a 2.5 percent decrease in net incurred losses, mainly from catastrophes, contributed. However, the 2025 outlook for homeowners is heavily influenced by the Los Angeles wildfires, with projections indicating that Q1 2025 could be the worst first quarter for the P&C industry in over 15 years. Current estimates suggest that the 2025 wildfires may lead to the costliest wildfire losses in U.S. history.

Jason B. Kurtz, FCAS, MAAA, a principal and consulting actuary at Milliman, emphasized the persistent negative influence of adverse prior year development (PYD) on the profitability of commercial auto and general liability lines, noting that this trend has been observed for three consecutive years.  

In discussing general liability, Kurtz pointed out the substantial reserve strengthening undertaken during 2024.

“The 2024 net combined ratio of 110 included a staggering nine points of adverse prior year development, amounting to more than $9 billion of reserve strengthening, the highest seen in at least 15 years,” Kurtz said. “It is also concerning that the hard-market years 2020-2023, which saw significant rate increases, are also seeing reserve increases.”  

Conversely, workers compensation combined ratios continued to benefit from favorable PYD for the eighth consecutive year, indicating sustained underwriting profitability.  

Donna Glenn, FCAS, MAAA, chief actuary at the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI), presented an overview of the year’s average loss cost level changes and provided insights into the long-term financial stability of the workers compensation system.  

“The workers compensation system continues an era of exceptional performance with strong results and a financially healthy line,” said Glenn. “And while there are early indications of potential headwinds on the horizon, the industry is positioned well to navigate these challenges.”  

*Note: Insurance Economics and Underwriting Projections: A Forward View is a quarterly report available exclusively to Triple-I members and Milliman customers.

Business Risk, Careers and Employment, Insurance Industry, Insurers and the Economy, Market Conditions, Risk Management, Specialty Coverage

Hartford’s Karla Scott on the Present & Future of Marine Insurance

Leave a comment

By Loretta L. Worters, Vice President of Media Relations, Triple-I

When Karla Scott first entered the insurance industry, she didn’t set out with a grand plan to become a leader in marine underwriting.

“I fell into it,” she admits. Starting at a brokerage firm focused on logistics insurance, she quickly discovered a passion for global trade and cargo underwriting.

“It’s different every day,” says Scott, who is global logistics product leader and senior managing director, Ocean Marine, The Hartford. She joined the company after The Hartford acquired Navigators in 2019.

“The technical work keeps my skills sharp, while the camaraderie and shared purpose offer personal and professional fulfillment.”

– Karla Scott

Scott works with clients, agents, and brokers around the world to ensure that businesses have the protection they need through the product’s entire supply-chain life cycle. Her team insures raw materials and finished goods that are transported on containerships, planes, trains, and trucks.  From geopolitics to commodity shifts, it’s an ever-evolving, complex industry that demands constant awareness and adaptation.

Now, with 24 years in marine insurance, Scott reflects on a career shaped by resilience, strong mentorship, and a deep commitment to community. Her journey underscores both the opportunities and challenges faced by women in a traditionally male-dominated field.

“Disrupting trade with…China, Canada, or Mexico would affect cost and the availability of insurance coverage.”

– Karla Scott

A Sea Change for Women

“Fifteen years ago, I sat at a table with 35 industry leaders and was the only woman,” Scott says. “But progress is happening. While marine insurance remains a niche within the broader insurance world, more women are entering the field and rising into leadership roles.”

There continues to be a gender pay gap and lack of career advancement opportunities, but Scott says “part of the reason, frankly, is that women tend not to self-advocate. It’s critical in the marine insurance space to promote yourself, but women often feel uncomfortable doing that.  Self-advocacy is not boastfulness. No one is going to put you in the spotlight unless you step into it.  Those are the skills we need to teach women coming up in this business.”

Being a woman on the West Coast in an East Coast-dominated industry meant navigating additional hurdles.

“There’s a current you swim against,” she says.

Overcoming Barriers

Support from forward-thinking male mentors and advisors helped her stay the course.

“I am indebted to three mentors who presented different strengths,” Scott says. “I learned how to manage people, to motivate people, technical skills, how important your reputation is in this industry, and how to push hard and be aggressive in certain situations and not aggressive in other situations.”

She also candidly addresses the internal battles many women face — imposter syndrome.

“I’ve experienced it myself and have reached out to my mentors, who are great at listening to my frustrations,” she says. “Having a strong network can help you work through those issues. Now that I’m on the other side, I’m pushing my mentees through those obstacles, helping them find their voice and teaching them to self-advocate—skills critical to closing the gender pay gap.”

The Power of Community

Scott’s involvement with the American Institute of Marine Underwriters (AIMU) and the Board of Marine Underwriters in San Francisco has been instrumental in her career. She has served as president of the latter twice and speaks passionately about the importance of collaboration in the insurance industry.

“One of the most unique parts of marine insurance is that we work in partnership with competitors to solve industry problems,” she says. “The technical work keeps my skills sharp, while the camaraderie and shared purpose offer personal and professional fulfillment.”

Trade Tensions and Industry Impacts

As global trade faces increasing scrutiny and tariff battles, Scott is already seeing the effects.

“Clients are canceling freight contracts, and volumes are dropping,” she says. “The result means lower trade volume, higher valuation of goods, and potential inflationary cycles may hit consumers hard.”

She points out that the lack of federal stimulus (unlike during the pandemic) leaves little room for economic cushioning.

“It’s a ‘hold your breath’ kind of moment,” Scott says.

Cargo theft is another growing concern.

“It spikes when inflation rises,” Scott notes, pointing out how easy it has become to resell stolen goods on platforms like Amazon and eBay.

Talk of reshoring manufacturing often overlooks the complexity of global trade.

“You can’t flip a light switch and manufacture everything in the U.S.,” she explains. “Machinery to build those goods often comes from Germany or Japan.

“Disrupting trade with top partners like China, Canada, or Mexico would significantly affect both cost and the availability of insurance coverage,” Scott says. “If consumer confidence drops and trade volumes fall, insurance demand will, too.”

Scott also highlights a deeper economic risk: the potential erosion of the U.S. dollar’s dominance in global trade. “If that shifts, the American economy could face even greater challenges.”

Auto Insurance, Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment

Florida Senate Rejects
Legal-Reform Challenge

Leave a comment

By Lewis Nibbelin, Contributing Writer, Triple-I

The Florida House’s attempt to curtail recent legal system reforms met firm resistance from the state Senate this week, preserving the 2022 and 2023 legislation that stabilized the state’s property insurance market.

Aiming to reinstate one-way attorney fees in insurance litigation, the House added an amendment – originally part of a separate bill – to an unrelated Senate bill focused on creating legal protections for owners of former mining sites.

Filed by state Rep. Berny Jacques, the amendment would have restored Florida’s previous requirement for insurers to shoulder the insured’s legal costs, even if the insured’s jury award was only slightly higher than the settlement insurers offered. Current law stipulates that each side is responsible for their own fees.

Senate members refused to concur with the proposal and sent the bill back to the House, which can either remove Jacques’ amendment or let the entire bill die.

Insurers and policyholders benefit

Jacques’ amendment prompted instant criticism from industry leaders, notably Florida Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworsky, who sent an email warning the governor’s legislative affairs director that it would dismantle “hard-won progress” achieved by the 2022-2023 reforms, according to a report by the South Florida Sun Sentinel.

That progress includes the introduction of 12 new insurers into Florida’s property sector after a multi-year exodus and a 23 percent decrease in lawsuit filings year over year, Yaworsky wrote.

Proponents of Jacques’ amendment argued it would return balance to the legal system, which had overcorrected to favor insurance companies at the expense of consumers.

Yet, in 2019, Florida accounted for just over 8 percent of U.S. homeowners insurance claims, but more than 76 percent of U.S. property claim lawsuits, pushing premium rates up to three times the national average. Post-reform, in 2024, 40 percent of all insurers in the state filed for rate decreases, with average home insurance premiums down 5.6 percent at the start of this year.

Reversing these reforms would reinvigorate fraudulent and unnecessary lawsuits, increasing insurer costs and, consequently, premium rates. Dulce Suarez-Resnick, an insurance agent based in Miami, told the Sun Sentinel that supporters predicted reforms wouldn’t be felt for three years.

“We are two years in, and I’ve already seen a lot of impact,” Suarez-Resnick said. “The Legislature needs to be patient. We have one more year to go.”

Reforms expected to remain intact

Though Florida’s 2025 legislative session was extended, the House has little time to push for further changes to the reforms. Even if the Senate somehow acquiesces and passes the amended bill, it is unlikely to survive – Gov. Ron DeSantis has vowed to veto any bill targeting tort reform and publicly condemned the House’s efforts to roll it back.

And Florida isn’t alone: Georgia successfully passed its own comprehensive tort reform package last month, after plaintiffs’ attorneys began transferring their marketing tactics to the neighboring state. State government moves like these are essential to eradicating legal system abuse and protecting all stakeholders from rising costs.

Learn More:

What Florida’s Misguided Investigation Means for Georgia Tort Reform

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Florida Reforms Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize 

Georgia Targets Legal System Abuse

How Georgia Might Learn From Florida Reforms

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Resilience Investments Paid Off in Florida During Hurricane Milton

Catastrophes, Coastal Property, Disaster Preparedness, Disaster Resilience, Emerging Risks, Flood Insurance, Homeowners Insurance, Industry Awards & Events, Insurers and the Economy, Lightning, Market Conditions, Risk Management, Technology, Wildfire

ClimateTech Connect Confronts Climate Peril From Washington Stage

Leave a comment
The Institutes’ Pete Miller and Francis Bouchard of Marsh McLennan discuss how AI is transforming property/casualty insurance as the industry attacks the climate crisis.

“Climate” is not a popular word in Washington, D.C., today, so it would take a certain audacity to hold an event whose title prominently includes it in the heart of the U.S. Capitol.

And that’s exactly what ClimateTech Connect did last week.

For two days, expert panels at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center discussed climate-related risks – from flood, wind, and wildfire to extreme heat and cold – and the role of technology in mitigating and building resilience against them. Given the human and financial costs associated with climate risks, it was appropriate to see the property/casualty insurance industry strongly represented.

Peter Miller, CEO of The Institutes, was on hand to talk about the transformative power of AI for insurers, and Triple-I President and CEO Sean Kevelighan discussed – among other things – the collaborative work his organization and its insurance industry members are doing in partnership with governments, non-profits, and others to promote investment in climate resilience. Triple-I is an affiliate of the Institutes.

Sean Kevelighan of Triple-I and Denise Garth, Majesco’s chief strategy officer, discuss how to ensure equitable coverage against climate events.

You can get an idea of the scope and depth of these panels by looking at the agenda, which included titles like:

  • Building Climate-Resilient Futures: Innovations in Insurance, Finance, and Real Estate;
  • Fire, Flood, and Wind: Harnessing the Power of Advanced Data-Driven Technology for Climate Resilience;
  • The Role of Technology and Innovation to Advance Climate Resilience Across our Cities, States and Communities;
  • Pioneers of Parametric: Navigating Risks with Parametric Insurance Innovations;
  • Climate in the Crosshairs: How Reinsurers and Investors are Redefining Risk; and
  • Safeguarding Tomorrow: The Regulator’s Role in Climate Resilience.

As expected, the panels and “fireside chats” went deep into the role of technology; but the importance of partnership, collaboration, and investment across stakeholder groups was a dominant theme for all participants. Coming as the Trump Administration takes such steps as eliminating FEMA’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program; slashing budgets of federal entities like the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Weather Service (NWS); and revoking FEMA funding for communities still recovering from last year’s devastation from Hurricane Helene, these discussions were, to say the least, timely.

Helge Joergensen, co-founder and CEO of 7Analytics, talks about using granular data to assess and address flood risk.

In addition to the panels, the event featured a series of “Shark Tank”-style presentations by Insurtechs that got to pitch their products and services to the audience of approximately 500 attendees. A Triple-I member – Norway-based 7Analytics, a provider of granular flood and landslide data – won the competition.

Earth Day 2025 is a good time to recognize organizations that are working hard and investing in climate-risk mitigation and resilience – and to recommit to these efforts for the coming years. What better place to do so than walking distance from both the White House and the Capitol?

Learn More:

BRIC Funding Loss Underscores Need for Collective Action on Climate Resilience

Claims Volume Up 36% in 2024; Climate, Costs, Litigation Drive Trend

Data Fuels the Assault on Climate-Related Risk

Outdated Building Codes Exacerbate Climate Risk

JIF 2024: Collective, Data-Driven Approaches Needed to Address Climate-Related Perils

Catastrophes, Coastal Property, Disaster Resilience, Flood Insurance, Floods, Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Market Conditions, Risk Management

BRIC Funding Loss Underscores Need
for Collective Action
on Climate Resilience

Leave a comment

The Trump Administration’s unwinding of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program and cancellation of all BRIC applications from fiscal years 2020-2023 reinforce the need for collaboration among state and local government and private-sector stakeholders in climate resilience investment.

Congress established BRIC through the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to ensure a stable funding source to support mitigation projects annually. The program has allocated more than $5 billion for investment in mitigation projects to alleviate human suffering and avoid economic losses from floods, wildfires, and other disasters. FEMA announced on April 4 that it is ending BRIC .

Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM), called the decision “beyond reckless.”

 “Although ASFPM has had some qualms about how FEMA’s BRIC program was implemented, it was still a cornerstone of our nation’s hazard mitigation strategy, and the agency has worked to make improvements each year,” Berginnis said. “Eliminating it entirely — mid-award cycle, no less — defies common sense.”

While the FEMA press release called BRIC a “wasteful, politicized grant program,” Berginnis said investments in hazard mitigation programs “are the opposite of ‘wasteful.’ “ He pointed to a study by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) that showed flood hazard mitigation investments return up to $8 in benefits for every $1 spent. 

“At this very moment, when states like Arkansas, Kentucky, and Tennessee are grappling with major flooding, the Administration’s decision to walk away from BRIC is hard to understand,” Berginnis said.

Heading into hurricane season

Especially hard hit will be catastrophe-prone Florida. Nearly $300 million in federal aid meant to help protect communities from flooding, hurricanes, and other natural disasters has been frozen since President Trump took office in January, according to an article in Government Technology.

The loss of BRIC funding leaves dozens of Florida projects in limbo, from a plan to raise roads in St. Augustine to a $150 million effort to strengthen canals in South Florida. According to Government Technology, the agency most impacted is the South Florida Water Management District, responsible for maintaining water quality, controlling the water supply, ecosystem restoration and flood control in a 16-county area that runs from Orlando south to the Keys.

“The district received only $6 million of its $150 million grant before the program was canceled,” the article said. “The money was intended to help build three structures on canals and basins in North Miami -Dade and Broward counties to improve flood mitigation.”

Florida’s Division of Emergency Management must return $36.9 million in BRIC money that was earmarked for management costs and technical assistance. Jacksonville will lose $24.9 million targeted to raise roads and make improvements to a water reclamation facility.

FEMA announced the decision to end BRIC the day after Colorado State University’s (CSU) Department of Atmospheric Science released a forecast projecting an above-average Atlantic hurricane season for 2025. Led by CSU senior research scientist and Triple-I non-resident scholar Phil Klotzbach CSU research team forecasts 17 named storms, nine hurricanes – four of them “major” (Category 3, 4, or 5).  A typical season has 14 named storms, seven hurricanes – three of them major.

Nationwide impacts

More than $280 million in federal funding for flood protection and climate resilience projects across New York City — “including critical upgrades in Central Harlem, East Elmhurst, and the South Street Seaport” – is now at risk, according to an article in AMNY. The cuts affect over $325 million in pending projects statewide and another $56 million of projects where work has already begun.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Gov. Kathy Hochul warned that the move jeopardizes public safety as climate-driven disasters become more frequent and severe.

“In the last few years, New Yorkers have faced hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, wildfires, and even an earthquake – and FEMA assistance has been critical to help us rebuild,” Hochul said. “Cutting funding for communities across New York is short-sighted and a massive risk to public safety.”

According to the National Association of Counties, cancellation of BRIC funding has several implications for counties, including paused or canceled projects, budget and planning adjustments, and reduced capacity for long-term risk reduction.

North Dakota, for example, has 10 projects that were authorized for federal funding. Those dollars will now be rescinded. Impacted projects include $7.1 million for a water intake project in Washburn; $7.8 million for a regional wastewater treatment project in Lincoln; and $1.9 million for a wastewater lagoon project in Fessenden. 

“This is devastating for our community,” said Tammy Roehrich, emergency manager for Wells County. “Two million dollars to a little community of 450 people is huge.”

The cancellation of BRIC roughly coincides with FEMA’s decision to deny North Carolina’s request to continue matching 100 percent of the state’s spending on Hurricane Helene recovery.

“The need in western North Carolina remains immense — people need debris removed, homes rebuilt, and roads restored,” said Gov. Josh Stein. “Six months later, the people of western North Carolina are working hard to get back on their feet; they need FEMA to help them get the job done.”

Resilience key to insurance availability

Average insured catastrophe losses have been on the rise for decades, reflecting a combination of climate-related factors and demographic trends as more people have moved into harm’s way.

“Investing in the resilience of homes, businesses, and communities is the most proactive strategy to reducing the damage caused by climate,” said Triple-I Chief Insurance Officer Dale Porfilio. “Defunding federal resilience grants will slow the essential investments being made by communities across the U.S.”

Flood is a particularly pressing problem, as 90 percent of natural disasters involve flooding, according to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The devastation wrought by Hurricane Helene in 2024 across a 500-mile swath of the U.S. Southeast – including Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas, Virginia, and Tennessee – highlighted the growing vulnerability of inland areas to flooding from both tropical and severe convective storms, as well as the scale of the flood-protection gap in non-coastal areas.

Coastal flooding in the U.S. now occurs three times more frequently than 30 years ago, and this acceleration shows no signs of slowing, according to recent research. By 2050, flood frequency is projected to increase tenfold compared to current levels, driven by rising sea levels that push tides and storm surges higher and further inland.

In addition to the movement of more people and property into harm’s way, climate-related risks are exacerbated by inflation (which drives up the cost of repairing and replacing damaged property); legal system abuse, (which delays claim settlements and drives up insurance premium rates); and antiquated regulations (like California’s Proposition 103) that discourage insurers from writing business in the states subject to them.  

Thanks to the engagement and collaboration of a range of stakeholders, some of these factors in some states are being addressed. Others – for example, improved building and zoning codes that could help reduce losses and improve insurance affordability – have met persistent local resistance.

As frequently reported on this blog, the property/casualty insurance industry has been working hard with governments, communities, businesses, and others to address the causes of high costs and the insurance affordability and availability challenges that flow from them. Triple-I, its members, and partners are involved in several of these efforts, which we’ll be reporting on here as they progress.

Learn More:

Tariff Uncertainty May Strain Insurance Markets, Challenge Affordability

Claims Volume Up 36% in 2024; Climate, Costs, Litigation Drive Trend

Triple-I Brief Highlights Rising Inland Flood Risk

Tenfold Frequency Rise for Coastal Flooding Projected by 2050

Hurricane Helene Highlights Inland Flood Protection Gap

Removing Incentives for Development From High-Risk Areas Boosts Flood Resilience

Executive Exchange: Using Advanced Tools to Drill Into Flood Risk

Auto Insurance, Business Insurance, Insurance Industry, Insurers and the Economy

Tariff Uncertainty May Strain Insurance Markets, Challenge Affordability

Leave a comment
Chief Economist and Data Scientist, Dr. Michel Léonard

Recent tariffs issued by U.S. President Donald Trump are on track to increase the price of parts and materials used in repairing and restoring property after an insurable event. Analysts and economists, predict these price hikes will lead to higher claim payouts for P&C insurers and, ultimately, higher premiums for policyholders. 

After making several announcements since early March 2025, on April 2, President Trump signed an executive order imposing a minimum 10 percent tariff on all U.S. imports, with higher levies on imports from 57 specific trading partners. A general tariff rate became effective on April 5, while tariffs on imports from the targeted nations, ranging from 11 to 50 percent, took effect on April 9. A 25 percent tariff applies to all steel and aluminum imports and cars. President Trump says he might consider a one-month exemption to the auto industry, but as of this writing, no changes have been issued. 

Generally, tariffs can bring in revenue for the issuing government but lower the operating margin for impacted domestic businesses. Inventory and supply chain managers may attempt to stockpile in advance of the new rates becoming effective, which in turn can spike demand and quickly spike prices for sought-after items. Eventually, these cost hikes get passed on to consumers.  

Nonetheless, to ride out the situation, inventory and supply chain managers need a fundamental level of predictability regarding what the levies will cover, what the rates are, and when these rates go into effect. The timing and scope of President Trump’s tariff policies have been challenging to nail down, including for many goods particularly relevant to construction and auto manufacturing. For example, his initially declared rates for major trading partners – Canada, Mexico, the European Union, and China – have fluctuated as these nations announced reciprocal tariffs, and those levies, in turn, were met with higher US rates. 

Then, on April 9, President Trump declared a 90-day pause on tariffs. This change was actually not a true pause but a reduction of previous rates for several countries to 10 percent, except for China. The White House has declared on April 10 that the previously announced 125 percent rate against goods from China is actually now 145 percent. 

According to S&P, the levy on auto industry imports has been comparatively less dynamic as, despite confusing announcements from the White House, there has been no change to President Trump’s 25 percent rate declared on March 26, “which applies to all light-vehicle imports, regardless of country. The 25 percent tariff includes auto parts as well as completely built up (CBU) vehicles. The CBU autos tariff went into effect on April 3, 2025, while the auto parts portion is due to come into effect on May 3, 2025.” 

As insurers grapple with risk management and inflationary pressures, other challenges posed by the tariffs can include issues for policyholders, specifically coverage affordability and availability. One downstream side effect may be the increased risk of expanding the protection gap – uninsurance and underinsurance (UM/UIM) due to higher premiums and higher valuations that can come into play when materials costs rise. Across the fifty states and the District of Columbia, one in three drivers (33.4 percent) were either uninsured or underinsured in 2023, according to a recent report, Uninsured and Underinsured Motorists: 2017–2023, by the Insurance Research Council (IRC), affiliated with The Institutes. 

Our Chief Economist and Data Scientist, Dr. Michel Léonard, shares his analysis of how the tariffs may impact the P&C Insurance industry.  

“There’s no crystal ball”, say Dr. Léonard, “but prudent risk underwriting and risk management suggests the use of scenarios and increased price ranges for different tariff levels, the more precise impact of which can be updated based on actual price increases for individual prices.”  

Dr. Léonard outlines three types of P&C replacement cost scenarios given different tariff ranges: 

1) For single-digit tariffs, while inventories last, higher prices below that tariff’s rate;  

2) for single-digit tariffs on goods still economically viable post-tariffs, higher prices up to the tariff’s rate; and  

3) for single and double-digit tariffs on goods no longer economically viable, a multiple of the pre-tariff price for tariff-evading goods.  

His presentation, Tariffs and Insurance: Economic Insights can be previewed, but the full version is currently available exclusively to Triple-I members.  

Triple-I remains committed to keeping abreast of these and other developments crucial to the insurance industry’s future. For more information, we invite you to stay tuned to our blog and join us at JIF 2025. 

Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment

Reining in Third-Party Litigation Funding Gains Traction Nationwide

Leave a comment

A record number of bills targeting third-party litigation funding are under consideration across the United States, with Georgia and Kansas already passing disclosure measures, according to an analysis by Insurance Insider.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office defines third-party litigation funding as “an arrangement in which a funder who is not a party to the lawsuit agrees to help fund it.” Global multi-billion-dollar investing firms have made it their sole or primary business and are experiencing strong growth. Because the market lacks transparency, estimates on its size can vary but, according to Swiss Re, more than half of the $17 billion invested into litigation funding globally in 2020 was deployed in the United States. Swiss Re estimates the market will be as high as $30 billion by 2028.

Meanwhile, affordability of insurance coverage – especially for commercial auto products – has come under threat from increases in litigation and claim costs. The national surge in legislation seeking to rein in this practice reflects growing concerns about its lack of transparency and undue influence of litigation financing by dark-money investors – many of them outside the United States.

Thirty-five separate bills have been introduced in U.S. statehouses so far this year. The Kansas bill was signed into law by Gov. Laura Kelly, and the Georgia bill is expected to be signed by Gov. Brian Kemp. Similar legislation is advancing through various committees in Arizona, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Oklahoma and have been proposed in more than two dozen other states.

The efforts are not only progressing at the state level. The U.S. House of Representatives is advancing HR 1109 – The Litigation Transparency Act of 2025 – which would regulate third-party litigation funding in federal court cases. A similar bill was introduced in 2024 but did not advance out of committee.

Third-party litigation funding is just one aspect of the larger issue of legal system abuse that contributes to challenges related to property/casualty insurance availability and affordability.

Learn More:

Indiana Joins March Toward Disclosure of Third-Party Litigation Funding Deals

Louisiana Litigation Funding Reform Vetoed; AOB Ban, Insurer Incentive Boost Make It Into Law

U.S. Study of Third-Party Litigation Funding Cites Market Growth and Scarce Transparency

IRC Study: Public Perceives Impact of Litigation on Auto Insurance Claims

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Georgia Targets Legal System Abuse

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Auto Insurance, Business Insurance, Catastrophes, Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Market Conditions, Wildfire

Despite Progress, California Insurance Market Faces Headwinds

Leave a comment

Even as California moves to address regulatory obstacles to fair, actuarially sound insurance underwriting and pricing, the state’s risk profile continues to evolve in ways that impede progress, according to the most recent Triple-I Issues Brief.

Like many states, California has suffered greatly from climate-related natural catastrophe losses. Like some disaster-prone states, it also has experienced a decline in insurers’ appetite for covering its property/casualty risks.

But much of California’s problem is driven by regulators’ application of Proposition 103 – a decades-old measure that constrains insurers’ ability to profitably write business in the state. As applied, Proposition 103 has:

  • Kept insurers from pricing catastrophe risk prospectively using models, requiring them to price based on historical data alone;
  • Barred insurers from incorporating reinsurance costs into pricing; and
  • Allowed consumer advocacy groups to intervene in the rate-approval process, making it hard for insurers to respond quickly to changing market conditions and driving up administration costs.

As insurers have adjusted their risk appetite to reflect these constraints, more property owners have been pushed into the California FAIR plan – the state’s property insurer of last resort.  As of December 2024, the FAIR plan’s exposure was $529 billion – a 15 percent increase since September 2024 (the prior fiscal year end) and a 217 percent increase since fiscal year end 2021. In 2025, that exposure will increase further as FAIR begins offering higher commercial coverage for larger homeowners, condominium associations, homebuilders and other businesses.

Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has implemented a Sustainable Insurance Strategy to alleviate these pressures. The strategy has generated positive impacts, but it continues to meet resistance from legislators and consumer groups. And, regardless of what regulators or legislators do, California homeowners’ insurance premiums will need to rise.

The Triple-I brief points out that – despite the Golden State’s many challenges – its homeowners actually enjoy below-average home and auto insurance rates as a percentage of median income. Insurance availability ultimately depends on insurers being able to charge rates that adequately reflect the full impact of increasing climate risk in the state. In a disaster-prone state like California, these artificially low premium rates are not sustainable.

“Higher rates and reduced regulatory restrictions will allow more carriers to expand their underwriting appetite, relieving the availability crisis and reliance on the FAIR plan,” said Triple-I Chief Insurance Officer Dale Porfilio.

With events like January’s devastating fires, frequent “atmospheric rivers” that bring floods and mudslides, and the ever-present threat of earthquakes – alongside the many more mundane perils California shares with its 49 sister states – premium rates that adequately reflect the full impact of these risks are essential to continued availability of private insurance.

Learn More:

California Insurance Market at a Critical Juncture

California Finalizes Updated Modeling Rules, Clarifies Applicability Beyond Wildfire

How Proposition 103 Worsens Risk Crisis in California

Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment, Market Conditions, Regulation, Risk Management

Claims Volume Up 36%
in 2024; Climate, Costs, Litigation Drive Trend

Leave a comment

By Lewis Nibbelin, Contributing Writer, Triple-I

U.S. property claims volume rose 36 percent in 2024, propelled by a 113 percent increase in catastrophe claims, according to a recent Verisk Analytics report.

While evolving climate risks fueled claim frequency, uncertain inflation trends and unchecked legal system abuse will likely further strain insurer costs and time to settle these claims, posing risks to coverage affordability and availability.

Abnormally active Atlantic hurricane season

In a “dramatic shift” from previous loss patterns, late-season hurricane activity – rather than winter storms – dictated fourth-quarter claims operations last year, Verisk reported. Hurricane-related claims comprised nearly 9 percent of total claims volume, at a staggering 1,100 percent increase from the third quarter of 2023. Flood and wind claims both also jumped by 200 percent in volume.

“This shift in risk patterns demands new approaches to risk assessment and resource planning, particularly in the Southeast, where costs increased at six times the national rate following hurricane activity,” Verisk stated. Notably, Hurricane Milton generated roughly 187,000 claims totaling $2.68 billion in replacement costs across the Southeast, with 8 percent of claims still outstanding as of the report’s release.

Another above-average hurricane season is projected for 2025 in the Atlantic basin, according to a forecast by Colorado State University’s (CSU) Department of Atmospheric Science. Led by CSU senior research scientist and Triple-I non-resident scholar Phil Klotzbach, the CSU research team forecasts 17 named storms, including nine hurricanes – four of them “major” – during  the 2025 season, which begins June 1 and continues through Nov. 30. A typical Atlantic season has 14 named storms, seven hurricanes, three of them major. Major hurricanes are defined as those with wind speeds reaching Category 3, 4, or 5 on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale.

Water, hail, and wind events in the Great Plains and Pacific Northwest also contributed to unexpected claim volumes, Verisk added. In contrast, wind-related claims fell in the Northeast compared to the fourth quarter of 2023.

Such regional variations highlight “the importance of granular, location-specific analysis for accurate risk assessment,” Verisk stated.

Contributing economic factors

Labor and material costs continued to rise year over year, with commercial reconstruction costs seeing a more pronounced increase of 5.5 percent compared to residential’s 4.5 percent, Verisk reported. The firm projected moderate reconstruction cost increases within both sectors during the first half of 2025.

Looming U.S. tariffs, however, may complicate this trajectory. Inflationary pressures related to the Trump Administration’s tariffs could further disrupt supply chains still recovering from natural catastrophes and the COVID-19 pandemic. Any such disruptions would compound replacement costs for U.S. auto and homeowners insurers as material costs – such as lumber, a major import from Canada – become even more expensive.

Excessive litigation trends

Similarly, excessive claims litigation – which prolongs claims disputes while driving up claim costs – plagues several of the states Verisk identified as experiencing increased claim volumes. For instance, though hurricane activity helps explain higher claim frequency in Georgia, the Peach State also is home to a personal auto claim litigation rate more than twice that of the median state, with a relative bodily injury claim frequency 60 percent higher than the U.S. average.

Verisk’s preliminary Q4 data reveals a 7 percent decrease in average claims severity compared to the same period in 2023 – a figure the firm expects to rise as more complex claims reach completion. But costly and protracted claims litigation, paired with ongoing tariff uncertainty, could magnify this figure even beyond their projections.

Undoubtedly, both will challenge insurers’ capacity to reliably predict loss trends and set fair and accurate premium rates for the foreseeable future, underscoring Verisk’s point that “staying ahead of these evolving patterns is essential in building more resilient operations in the future.”

Learn More:

Tenfold Frequency Rise for Coastal Flooding Projected by 2050

How Tariffs Affect P&C Insurance Prospects

What Florida’s Misguided Investigation Means for Georgia Tort Reform

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Florida Reforms Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize 

Georgia Targets Legal System Abuse

Severe Convective Storm Risks Reshape U.S. Property Insurance Market

New Triple-I Issue Brief Puts the Spotlight on Georgia’s Insurance Affordability Crisis

P/C Replacement Costs Seen Outpacing CPI in 2025

California Insurance Market at a Critical Juncture

Florida’s Progress in Legal Reform: A Model for 2025

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Data Fuels the Assault on Climate-Related Risk

California Finalizes Updated Modeling Rules, Clarifies Applicability Beyond Wildfire

U.S. Consumers See Link Between Attorney Involvement in Claims and Higher Auto Insurance Costs