Category Archives: Legal Environment

Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment

Take Care in Addressing Homeowners’ Premiums, Bloomberg Cautions Policymakers

Leave a comment

By Jeff Dunsavage, Senior Research Analyst, Triple-I

While rising homeowners’ insurance can be a problem for some consumers, a recent Bloomberg editorial cautions policymakers against pursuing “simplistic solutions, such as capping premiums, subsidizing homebuyers, or punishing investors.”

Instead, it recommends taking steps to increase investment in catastrophe resilience and mitigate claim cost drivers, such as legal system abuse.

Bloomberg attributes slumping condominium prices and rising rents, in part, to increasing homeowners’ insurance premiums.

“Average homeowners insurance premiums rose almost 25 percent from 2019 to 2024 in real terms,” the editorial says. While politicians “have been quick to blame greedy insurers,” the reality is more complicated. Contributing factors include:

  • Increasingly costly disasters – evidenced by a sharp increase in billion-dollar catastrophes. In 2025, Bloomberg says, insured losses from such calamities reached $108 billion.
  • Insufficient investment by states in disaster resilience measures, “such as retrofitting public works and enforcing appropriate building codes”.
  • Escalating legal costs that are passed on to homeowners.

“In many states,” Bloomberg says, “underwriters must contend with laws that favor plaintiffs, outsized jury awards, and a proliferation of funds that specialize in financing lawsuits. Research suggests that such costs have been the single biggest driver of premium increases in recent years.”

Also feeding higher premiums are increased replacement costs related to record inflation during and since the COVID-19 pandemic.

In attempts to address these rising costs, several states in recent years have introduced legislative measures that would do more harm to homebuyers than good. Illinois insurers last year narrowly avoided increased government involvement in insurance pricing as state legislators rejected “an extreme prior-approval system found nowhere else in the country,” according to a joint statement from the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and the Illinois Insurance Association.

When California tried to artificially suppress premiums, “underwriters fled the market and left homeowners and the state’s insurer of last resort exposed to last year’s horrific wildfires”.  Since then, the state has allowed significant premium rate increases to lure insurers back.

Bloomberg recommends that states start by prioritizing the resilience of buildings and public works.

“Tax breaks and grants for hardening homes against floods, fire, and wind are a short‑term expense with long‑term benefits,” the editorial says, citing research that found communities lose as much as $33 in future economic activity for every $1 not invested in preparedness.

“The federal government, for its part, should commit to restoring FEMA’s pre‑disaster mitigation program and similar efforts,” Bloomberg says. “With strong oversight, such investment can protect property, limit job losses, accelerate rebuilding, reduce premiums, improve public health, and ultimately save money and lives.”

When it comes to litigation trends that put upward pressure on claim costs and, ultimately, premium rates, Florida offers an encouraging example.

“In 2021, the state was home to 6.9 percent of homeowner claims but 76 percent of the lawsuits against insurers,” Bloomberg says. “State lawmakers enacted reforms over the next two years that limited plaintiffs’ ability to allege negligence and recoup expenses, with significant results: At least 17 new insurers entered the market and dozens reduced premiums.”

Triple-I, its members, and its partners have long been engaged in helping policymakers and the public understand the forces that affect insurance affordability and availability and how they can help mitigate the factors that drive up costs.  

“It’s refreshing to see this type of thoughtful analysis of the homeowners’ insurance market by an authoritative financial news organization like Bloomberg,” said Triple-I CEO Sean Kevelighan.  “Consumers and policymakers need to understand that higher premiums are a symptom of the current risk environment, not its cause.”

Learn More:

Triple-I Testifies on New York Insurance Affordability

Florida Governor Touts Auto Insurance Rebates, Tort Reform Success

Resilience Investment Payoffs Outpace Future Costs More Than 30 Times

JIF 2025: U.S. Policy Changes and Uncertainty Imperil Insurance Affordability

Allstate, Aspen Initiative Seeks to Ease Trust Gap

Illinois Lawmakers Reject Risk-Based Pricing Challenge

New Illinois Bills Would Harm — Not Help — Auto Policyholders

Insurance Affordability, Availability Demand Collaboration, Innovation

Disasters, Litigation Reshape Homeowners’ Insurance Affordability

Tariff Uncertainty May Strain Insurance Markets, Challenge Affordability

Affordability, Auto Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment

New York Among
Least Affordable States for Auto Insurance

Leave a comment

By Lewis Nibbelin, Research Writer, Triple-I

New Yorkers pay the fourth-highest personal auto expenditures in the United States, costing households an average of $1,935 in 2024, or 2.23 percent of the state’s median household income, according to Triple-I’s latest Affordability Outlook.

Up from New York’s average of $1,753 in 2023, Triple-I’s estimates reflect the burgeoning toll of several expenditure cost drivers in the Empire State, many of which are structural factors beyond the insurance industry. Citing data from the Insurance Research Council (IRC) – like Triple-I, an affiliate of The Institutes – the report highlights four cost drivers that rank among the highest in the country, including:

  • Repair costs: New York has the third-highest auto repairs costs in the United States, at $864 more than the national average;
  • Carrier expense index: New York has the third-highest carrier expense index for personal auto insurance, at 14.9 percent of losses;
  • Injury claim costs: New York has the third-highest average injury claim severity in the country, at more than twice the national average; and
  • Accident frequency: New York has the eighth-highest average frequency of personal auto accidents in the nation, at 3.09 accidents.

While traffic density, road conditions, and driver education can contribute to accident frequency and severity, excessive and fraudulent claims litigation also fuel rising auto insurance premiums and overall costs in the state. Wiping out billions of dollars in U.S. economic activity annually, legal system abuse costs New York residents 427,794 jobs and $7,027 for each household per year, earning the state a recurring spot on the American Tort Reform Foundation’s list of “judicial hellholes.”

A surge in staged crashes underpins these figures, leaving drivers increasingly vulnerable to fraudulent damage or injury claims. Such incidents – totaling 1,729 in New York in 2023 – keep upward pressure on auto rates for all policyholders, inflating average auto premium by as much as $300 per year, Triple-I estimates.

To alleviate these cost burdens, a package of state budget proposals was recently unveiled to secure $2 million in funding for investigations into alleged auto fraud and introduce new regulations that extend the timeframe for carriers to report suspicious claims. Another law would cap pain and suffering damages awarded to drivers who engaged in criminal behavior, such as those who were uninsured at the time of the incident.

New York policymakers also passed legislation last month aimed at third-party litigation funding (TPLF), or funding from often anonymous investors who can delay prompt settlements in exchange for a share of larger damage awards, thereby propelling claims costs. Though falling short of mandating TPLF disclosure during litigation, the new law parallels effective tort reforms in other states, offering hope toward insurance market stability.

Homeowners insurance holds steady

Conversely, New York’s homeowners insurance premiums “are relatively average and reasonable as a percentage of household income,” contradicting “the narrative of an affordability crisis in New York’s homeowners insurance market,” said Patrick Schmid, Triple-I’s chief insurance officer, in written testimony to state lawmakers.

With a 2.11 percent ratio of homeowners insurance expenditure to median household income, New York ranks 29th in an affordability study by the IRC, suggesting property and replacement costs contribute to the state’s housing affordability issues.

Policy interventions in insurance markets “would address a symptom rather than the cause” of such issues, Schmid stressed, urging lawmakers to focus instead on improving building material and labor costs; litigation trends; and other inflationary pressures.

While the specific policy levers may differ, Florida’s legal reforms in 2022 and 2023 led to 17 new insurance companies entering the state and rate reductions for dozens of homeowners and auto insurers, including a 6.5 percent average rate decrease for the state’s top five personal auto insurers in 2025.

Once a “poster child” for legal system abuse, Florida’s success demonstrates the need for continued reform in 2026 to promote a more competitive insurance market and greater affordability for consumers.

Learn More:

Triple-I Testifies on New York Insurance Affordability

Florida Governor Touts Auto Insurance Rebates, Tort Reform Success

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

Insurance Affordability, Availability Demand Collaboration, Innovation

Disasters, Litigation Reshape Homeowners’ Insurance Affordability

Affordability, Auto Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment, Regulation

La. Auto Insurance Rates Benefit From Declines
in Frequency, Severity

Leave a comment

By Lewis Nibbelin, Research Writer, Triple-I

More than 20 requests for auto insurance rate decreases have been filed with Louisana’s Department of Insurance by insurers since mid-2025. According to the department, the decreases were driven by reductions in accident frequency and severity.

“I’m glad to see positive movement on auto rates in Louisiana for the first time in years,” said Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple. “Because fewer accidents are contributing to these lower losses for insurers, we should not necessarily expect to see this level of decrease in future years unless we continue to pursue legal reform that addresses the foundational reasons our rates are the highest in the country.”

Temple said he hopes for further rate changes as the market continues to stabilize, citing Florida’s recent premium reductions after sweeping tort reform legislation in 2022 and 2023.

Longstanding affordability challenges

Among those who filed for rate decreases include Louisiana’s largest auto insurers, with the latest reductions impacting nearly 470,000 Progressive policyholders, or roughly 23.5 percent of the state’s auto market. More than one million State Farm policies also achieved lower average rates implemented this month.

While the statewide decreases can offer relief for drivers in one of the least affordable states for auto insurance, Temple cautioned that rates for individual policyholders will differ based on personal risk factors, urging consumers to shop among the “30 companies that have taken a rate decrease.”

The announcement arrives less than a year after Louisiana lawmakers passed a 2025 tort reform package to curb excessive lawsuits and a rate of bodily injury claims more than twice the national average. Beyond fueling higher insurance premiums in the state, such practices generate an annual $965 “tort tax” on every Louisianan and cost over 40,562 jobs per year, as highlighted by Triple-I’s consumer awareness campaign to build support for the reforms.

Other 2025 legislative measures, however, stipulate increased regulatory intervention in rate-setting, which can create further strain on an insurance market just beginning to recover. Another bill targeting nuclear verdicts (awards of $10 million or more) also failed to pass, playing a role in the state’s recurring spot on the American Tort Reform Foundation’s annual list of “judicial hellholes.”

Noting that reduced accident frequency contributed to the rate changes, Temple said in a statement that “we should not necessarily expect to see this level of decrease in future years unless we continue to pursue legal reform that addresses the foundational reasons our rates are the highest in the country.”

Lessons from Florida

Measurable benefits from Louisiana’s existing reforms may require a few more years to unfold, Temple added, based on the trajectory of similar legislation in Florida. In 2022, Florida accounted for over 70 percent of the nation’s homeowners claim-related litigation, despite representing only 15 percent of homeowners’ insurance claims, according to the state’s Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR). State legislators responded to the crisis with several tort laws that, among other things, eliminated one-way attorney fees and assignment of benefits (AOB) for property insurance claims.

Under the reforms, 17 new insurance companies have entered the Sunshine State and dozens of homeowners’ and auto insurers have filed for rate decreases, with Citizens Property Insurance – the state’s insurer of last resort – approved for major average rate cuts this spring, according to a recent announcement from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

A 50 percent drop in Citizens policies in 2025 helped facilitate the cuts, reflecting the largest transition of policies back to the private market in a decade. Later that year, additional cost-savings achieved through the reforms helped state regulators secure nearly $1 billion in premium refunds for Progressive auto insurance policyholders in the state.

Though the specific policy levers may differ, Florida’s reforms continue to model the kinds of market improvements that states like Louisiana and Georgia can expect after successfully passing their own tort legislation. State government moves like these are essential to eradicating legal system abuse and keeping insurance affordable and available, especially as legislative challenges to legal reform persist.

“Premiums are lowering because we’ve enacted real reforms and withstood the pressure to reverse course,” DeSantis said. “We will hold firm in our commitment not to go back to the broken insurance market of the past.”

Learn More:

Significant Tort Reform Advances in Louisiana

Florida Governor Touts Auto Insurance Rebates, Tort Reform Success

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

Louisiana Senator Seeks Resumption of Resilience Investment Program

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Who’s Financing Legal System Abuse? Louisianans Need to Know

Auto Insurance, Business Insurance, General Liability, Legal Environment

Claims Severity Drives Liability Insurance Losses

Leave a comment

By William Nibbelin, Senior Research Actuary, Triple-I

Economic and social inflation have added a staggering $231.6 billion to $281.2 billion in increased liability insurance losses and Defense and Cost Containment expenses in auto and general liability lines, a new report by Triple-I and the Casualty Actuarial Society.

The study – The Impact of Increasing Inflation on Liability Insurance 2015 – 2024 – says this structural rise in loss costs is amplified by what is broadly identified as legal system abuse.

The dual engine of increasing inflation

The analysis focuses on the total impact of increasing inflation determined through actuarial methods that are unable to decompose the precise contribution of economic inflation versus the role of what Triple-I characterizes as “legal system abuse” — policyholder or plaintiff attorney practices that increase costs and time to settle claims to the detriment of consumers, businesses, and the economy.  These practices include increasing litigiousness, third-party litigation financing, and soaring jury awards.

Claim severity powers losses

Across all lines analyzed, claim severity – not frequency – emerges as the primary driver of the escalating losses in liability lines of insurance. While the number of claims (frequency) has either generally declined or remained below pre-pandemic levels across the study period, the average cost per claim (severity) has soared. In commercial auto liability, for example, frequency has fallen dramatically since the pandemic, yet losses have still increased relentlessly because severity has risen 93.5 percent between 2015 and 2024.

Auto Liability

The report’s traditional focus on auto liability lines continues to show the most significant dollar-based impacts.

  • Personal auto liability: Increasing Inflation added between $91.6 billion and $102.3 billion to losses and DCC for the 2015–2024 period. This represents 8.7 percent  to 9.7 percent of losses and DCC for the period and an increase of 20 percent to 26 percent from the previous analysis on years 2014 through 2023. While the implied compound annual impact is lower than in the commercial sector, the dollar amount is huge due to the line’s immense underlying size. Personal auto severity has accelerated significantly post-2019, nearly tripling its compounded annual growth rate to 10.9 percent from 2019 to 2024. Premiums are only just beginning to rebound from pandemic-era lows, lagging the rise in losses.
  • Commercial Auto Liability: This line continues to sustain higher inflation rates in percentage terms. The total impact of increasing inflation reached $52.0 billion to $70.8 billion (22.6 percent  to 30.8 percent of booked losses). This represents an increase of 22 percent to 27 percent from the previous analysis.

A compelling cross-data set comparison with the Triple-I 2025 report, Review of Motor Vehicle Tort Cases Across the Federal And State Civil Courts, suggests that the “excess value” extracted by motor vehicle tort lawsuits—a clear measure of legal system abuse—was approximately $42.8 billion between 2014 and 2023. This quantitative finding suggests legal system abuse accounts for roughly one-third of the total Increasing Inflation effect in auto liability losses.

General liability lines

This year’s analysis expands to quantify the impact across broader general liability lines for the first time, revealing inflationary rates that are equally, if not more, dramatic in percentage terms.

  • Other Liability – Occurrence: Increasing inflation added between $83.4 billion and $103.3 billion to losses and DCC for the 2015–2024 period. This inflationary problem is comparable in dollar terms to personal auto liability, despite having only about one-third of the loss volume. Its implied annual impact of 3.7 percent on a paid basis is the highest of all the lines studied. Severity in this line grew at a compound annual rate of 6.8% from 2015 to 2024, far outpacing the Consumer Price Index All-Urban (CPI-U).
  • Product Liability – Occurrence: Increasing inflation added between $4.6 billion and $4.8 billion to losses and DCC for the 2015–2024 period. The smallest line examined exhibits the most dramatic severity trend with a compound annual growth rate of 22.3 percent between 2015 and 2024, resulting in a 512.5 percent severity increase overall. The effects appear to be accelerating, with the impact on Accident Year 2024 alone estimated at over 50% of that year’s booked losses.

For the “claims-made” categories of these liability lines (“other liability” and “product liability”), the study was unable to develop credible quantitative estimates due to shifts in business mix, data variability, and the inherent heterogeneity of the underlying risks. However, these lines have certainly not escaped the increasing inflationary environment.

Looking ahead

The data confirms a difficult truth: Even as general consumer price inflation (CPI-U) moderated to 3.0 percent in 2024—a reduction from the 2021-2023 average of 5.6 percent—the loss inflation in liability insurance remains structurally elevated. This means the economic tailwinds that temporarily exacerbated the problem are lessening, but the foundational issues of legal system abuse persist, locking in a higher rate of loss for the foreseeable future.

For consumers and businesses, this translates directly into higher premiums and a greater strain on their financial well-being. The challenge for insurers is the need to adapt to an elevated inflationary environment to effectively manage future liabilities. Recognizing and addressing the pervasive influence of legal system abuse is therefore essential for both managing risk and protecting consumers and businesses from ever-rising costs.

Triple-I continues to foster a research-based conversation around legal system abuse. For an overview of the topic and other helpful resources about its potential impact on insurers, policyholders, and the economy, check out our knowledge hub.

Auto Insurance, Legal Environment, Market Conditions, Regulation

Florida Governor Touts Auto Insurance Rebates, Tort Reform Success

Leave a comment

By Jeff Dunsavage, Senior Research Analyst, Triple-I

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced last week that state regulators have secured nearly $1 billion in premium refunds for Progressive auto insurance policyholders in the state, due to cost savings achieved through litigation reform.

DeSantis, who signed sweeping tort reform legislation bills into law in 2022 and 2023, said the refunds are a direct result of declining litigation expenses in Florida’s auto insurance market.

“Florida was really considered a litigation hellhole by a lot of folks,” DeSantis said. “That contributed to consumers having to bear more costs with respect to auto insurance.”

He pledged Insurance Commissioner Mike Yaworksy is negotiating with other major auto carriers for similar reimbursements to their customers.

Mark Friedlander, Triple-I’s director of communications, told Spectrum News Florida that reduced lawsuit expenses has enabled auto insurers to lower average costs and, in some cases, return premium to customers.

“When you take that out of the equation — all of those abusive lawsuits — this brings down the expenses, and that in turn gets passed along to the consumer,” Friedlander said. “The consumer wins with legal system reform.”

Learn More:

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

Florida Senate Rejects Legal-Reform Challenge

What Florida’s Misguided Investigation Means for Georgia Tort Reform

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Florida Reforms Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize 

How Georgia Might Learn From Florida Reforms

Resilience Investments Paid Off in Florida During Hurricane Milton

Florida Homeowners Premium Growth Slows as Reforms Take Hold, Inflation Cools

Disaster Preparedness, Disaster Resilience, Homeowners Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment, Market Conditions, Regulation

Calls for Insurance-Price Legislation Would Hurt Policyholders, Not Help

Leave a comment

Increased legislative involvement in regulating homeowners’ insurance pricing and rates – as recently called for by some officials in Illinois – would hurt insurance affordability in the state, rather than helping consumers as intended, Triple-I says in its latest Issues Brief.

Rising premiums are a national issue. They reflect a combination of costly climate-related weather events, demographic trends, and rising material and labor costs to repair and replace damaged or destroyed property. Average insured catastrophe losses have been increasing for decades, fueled in part by natural disasters and population shifts into high-risk areas. More recently, these and other losses to which the property/casualty insurance industry is vulnerable were exacerbated by inflation related to the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Tariffs and changes in U.S. economic policies have since put even more upward pressure on costs.

These increasing costs – if not addressed – threaten to erode the policyholder surplus insurers are required to keep on hand to pay claims. If surplus falls below a certain level, insurers have no choice but to increase premium rates or adjust their willingness to assume risks in certain areas.

To avoid this, many insurers have filed with state regulators for rate increases – requests that often meet with resistance from consumer advocacy groups and legislators. Illinois would not be the first state to try to ease consumers’ pain by constraining insurers’ ability to accurately set coverage prices to reflect increasing levels of risk and costs.

Practicality, not politics

Such efforts, while perhaps politically popular, confuse one symptom (higher premiums) of a growing risk crisis with its underlying cause (increasing losses and rising costs). Using the blunt instrument of legislation to address the complexities and sensitivities of underwriting and pricing would tend to disrupt the market and further hurt insurance affordability – and, in some areas, availability.

Rather than target insurers with misguided legislation, the brief says, states would be wiser to work with the industry to improve their risk profiles by investing in mitigation and resilience. The brief describes the causes of higher premium rates nationally and in Illinois and how other states have successfully collaborated to address those causes and reduce upward pressure on – and eventually bring down –premium rates.

“Triple-I welcomes the opportunity to collaborate with state policymakers to develop constructive approaches to risk mitigation and resilience that will benefit communities and consumers,” the brief says.

Learn More:

Revealing Hidden Cost to Consumers of Auto Litigation Inflation

Easing Home Upkeep to Control Insurance Costs

Survey: Homeowners See Value of Aerial Imagery for Insurers; Education Key to Comfort Levels

Nonprofit to Rescue NOAA Billion-Dollar Dataset

2025 Cat Losses to Date Are 2nd-Costliest Since Records Have Been Kept

2025 Tornadoes Highlight Convective Storm Losses

Auto Premium Growth Slows as Policyholders Shop Around, Study Says

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

IoT Solutions Offer Homeowners, Insurers Value — But How Much?

Texas: A Microcosm of U.S. Climate Perils

New Illinois Bills Would Harm — Not Help — Auto Policyholders

Illinois Bill Highlights Need for Education on Risk-Based Pricing of Insurance Coverage

Hail: The “Death by 1,000 Paper Cuts” Peril

Auto Insurance, Legal Environment

Revealing Hidden Cost
to Consumers of Auto Litigation Inflation

Leave a comment

By William Nibbelin, Senior Research Actuary, Triple-I

Motor vehicle tort cases in federal and state courts generated $42.8 billion in “excess value” from 2014 to 2023, according to new analysis by Triple-I.

“Excess value” may sound like a good thing, but it’s not. It represents an additional cost of motor vehicle civil litigation – above and beyond what it would have been if prior trends in court filings had continued. From 1995 to 2007, filings declined, and from 2007 to 2014 they were flat.

The report illustrates the impact of litigation inflation on insurance premiums for all drivers. It also underscores the challenges related to accurately quantifying and comparing state-by-state experience.

Lawsuits push premium up

As Triple-I has previously reported, litigation trends are a major force driving up auto insurance premiums.  As claims costs rise – whether due to rising repair costs, litigation, or other factors – premiums must increase to ensure that insurers have enough policyholder surplus to pay future, higher claims.

Policyholder surplus is not a nice-to-have extra. It is the money state regulators require insurers to maintain so they will be able to keep their promises to pay policyholders. In addition, credit rating agencies expect insurers to keep even larger surpluses than the states mandate to enable the insurers to borrow at more favorable interest rates when needed.

Interestingly, motor vehicle tort settlement amounts appear to have decreased on average between 2014 and 2023. While actual settlement amounts are not reported, the “amount in controversy” – legalese for the amount demanded by the plaintiff – serves as a proxy for filings disposed as settlements. The average amount in controversy decreased from $748,000 in the first of the three decades under consideration to $674,000 in the third.

However, the increased volume of cases during the period drove the overall excess value to $984.6 million at the federal level alone.

State courts present a challenge

The report estimates that state courts handled approximately 5.0 million motor vehicle tort cases from 2014 to 2023, generating an excess value of $41.8 billion – dwarfing the federal court impact. This analysis, however, is challenged by the state-by-state variety of definitions and criteria for data collection.  

“Because states maintain different definitions and criteria for data collection, most state civil case data is either unavailable or incomplete,” the report says.

The report concludes that its findings align with previous research by Triple-I and the Casualty Actuarial Society, which quantified increasing inflation on auto liability insurance at $118.9 billion for 2014-2023, representing both litigation and economic inflation.

“As we continue to analyze the evolving landscape of motor vehicle litigation, it’s clear that a deeper, data-driven understanding of both national and state trends is crucial,” said Patrick Schmid, Triple-I’s chief insurance officer. “Only with more transparent and comprehensive data can we craft effective solutions that benefit both policyholders and the broader insurance market. Future research should focus on bridging the gaps in state-level information and exploring the causal factors behind rising litigation and its impacts.”

Learn More:

New Consumer Guide Highlights Economic Impact of Legal System Abuse and the Need for Reform

Auto Premium Growth Slows as Policyholders Shop Around, Study Says

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Personal Auto Shines, General Liability Faces Headwinds in Q3 2025

Even With Recent Rises, Auto Insurance Is More Affordable Than During Most of Century to Date

Georgia Targets Legal System Abuse

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Despite Fewer Claims, Personal Auto Insurance Payouts Increase

Auto Insurance, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment, Market Conditions

Auto Premium Growth Slows As Policyholders Shop Around, Study Says

Leave a comment

Improved loss ratios, strong premium growth, and lower retention rates characterized the U.S. auto insurance industry in 2024, according to LexisNexis® Risk Solutions’ 2025 U.S Auto Insurance Trends Report.

The report shows that, “while a number of insurers returned to profitability as the market softened,” the market was characterized by “record levels of policy shopping and switching, attorney representation, claims severity, and rising driving violations.”

Rate increases over the past two years helped U.S. insurers address profitability issues, the report said. Premium rate increases are beginning to ease, rising 10 percent in 2024, compared with a 15 percent hike in 2023, as market conditions soften. Insurer profitability is improving, with direct written premiums growing 13.6 percent, to $359 billion, and incurred loss ratios stabilizing, enabling some carriers to pursue growth strategies and file for rate decreases.

LexisNexis Risk Solutions also notes that tariffs may factor into how insurers consider rate in 2025.  While the market wouldn’t expect the magnitude of activity seen between 2022 through 2024, tariffs, if they stick, could set off a ripple effect of moderate rate increases with implications across the industry.

Other trends identified in the report include:

  • Bodily injury claims severity jumped 9.2 percent, and property damage severity climbed 2.5 percent, year over year. In contrast, collision severity fell 2.5 percent for the same period.
  • All driving violations increased 17percent and driving violation rates across the United States surpassed 2019 levels.
  • Policy shopping reached an all-time high, with more than 45 percent of policies in force shopped at least once by year-end.

The report also noted that electric vehicle (EV) transitions are introducing new risks, as drivers moving from internal combustion engine vehicles to EVs experienced a 14 percet rise in claim frequency.

“Auto insurers continue to navigate a dynamic market,” said Jeff Batiste, senior vice president and general manager, U.S. auto and home insurance, LexisNexis Risk Solutions. “The combination of the market softening and a return to profitability presents a potential new chapter for the industry as insurers encounter a consumer base that is more willing than ever to shop for deals.”

Record levels of auto policy switching translated to 2024’s new policy growth rate of 17.7 percent year over year. It also added momentum to the ongoing customer retention decline across the industry.

Since 2021, retention has decreased five percentage points, to 78 percent, resulting in a 22 percent increase in policy churn, the report says.

“Historically, dropping even one percentage point is significant,” it says. “However, against a backdrop of heightened levels of shopping and switching activity, insurers may want to focus on their retention strategies, especially when long-tenured customers are hitting the market.”

Learn More:

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

Personal Auto Shines, General Liability Faces Headwinds in Q3 2025

Personal Auto 2024 Underwriting Results Best Since Pandemic

Even With Recent Rises, Auto Insurance Is More Affordable Than During Most of Century to Date

New IRC Report: Personal Auto Insurance State Regulation Systems

Legal Environment

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

Leave a comment

Florida’s top five auto insurance groups are cutting personal auto rates by a statewide average of 6.5 percent due to legislative reforms that addressed legal system abuse and assignment of benefits (AOB) claim fraud, the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) announced this week.

“Citizens of the Sunshine State are now clearly seeing the benefits of a more stable and affordable insurance marketplace,” Triple-I CEO Sean Kevelighan said.

State leaders credit the reforms for driving down both average rates and loss ratios, with Florida now reporting the lowest personal auto liability loss ratio in the United States, OIR said. Improved underwriting results and reduced litigation are helping insurers lower premiums, while increased consumer shopping is boosting competition and affordability across the state’s auto insurance market.

Resistance to reforms persists

Despite the measurable benefits to consumers, these reforms are under attack in the state legislature. HB 947 and  HB 837 would undo much of this progress.

“The continued reduction in auto insurance rates is yet another sign that Florida’s reforms are working,” said Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. “We will protect our reforms from those who seek to undo them and continue to fight for Floridians.”

Other states, including Georgia and Louisiana, are following Florida’s lead.

Premium relief for Florida drivers comes on top of significant improvements in the state’s property insurance market, where many consumers are securing better rates for their home insurance due to legislative reform and a competitive market with more than a dozen new carriers, Triple-I Director of Corporate Communications Mark Friedlander told BestWire.

“For many years, unscrupulous glass vendors preyed upon Florida drivers at car washes, gas stations, and shopping center parking lots with promises of gift cards in exchange for signing over their glass repair,” Friedlander said. “When insurers rejected these highly inflated claims, frivolous lawsuits followed.”

Learn More:

Disasters, Litigation Reshape Homeowners’ Insurance Affordability

New Consumer Guide Highlights Economic Impact of Legal System Abuse and the Need for Reform

Florida Bills Would Reverse Progress on Costly Legal System Abuse

Georgia Targets Legal System Abuse

Louisiana Reforms: Progress, But More Is Needed to Stem Legal System Abuse

Triple-I Issues Brief: Florida Reforms Bear Fruit as Premium Rates Stabilize (Members Only)

Triple-I Issues Brief: Georgia Insurance Affordability (Members Only)

Triple-I Issues Brief: Louisiana Insurance Market (Members Only)

Disaster Preparedness, Disaster Resilience, Industry Financials, Insurers and the Economy, Legal Environment, Market Conditions

JIF 2025: Federal Cuts Imperil Resilience Efforts

Leave a comment

By Lewis Nibbelin, Contributing Writer, Triple-I

Recent efforts to curb federal spending – particularly massive proposed cuts to several major federal science agencies and numerous FEMA grant programs – drew concern from panelists at Triple-I’s Joint Industry Forum in Chicago.

Slated to lose around half of their original budgets, organizations like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) provide insurers with much of the research data needed to model climate risks, at no cost to insurers nor the broader public. Abolishing this research, which also enables daily weather and natural disaster forecasting, will increase underwriting costs and those associated with various other industries, including transportation, agriculture, and energy.

“Federal science agencies probably facilitate more economic activity in the country than any other federal agency,” said Frank Nutter, president of the Reinsurance Association of America (RAA). “Fully funding and restaffing those agencies is pretty critical.”

A host of cancelled FEMA mitigation programs have left dozens of catastrophe-prone communities without aid – including projects that were approved before the cuts. Ending the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, for instance, rescinded approximately $882 million in climate resilience funding  —  “money  we could have spent on mitigation, so we don’t have to spend so much after a disaster,” said Neil Alldredge, president and CEO of the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC).

Nutter added that “weighing against safety, teacher salaries – all the kinds of things that communities grapple with,” most former grantees lack the resources for “risk reduction or municipal projects and infrastructure” without federal investment.

Population growth in high-risk areas exacerbates the issue, Alldredge said.

“If you look at a map of this country and the population changes from 1980 to today, we have moved the entire population to all the wrong places,” he explained. Building properties capable of withstanding these weather patterns – let alone insuring them – has launched the industry into “a new era of risk.”

While the panelists agreed that opportunities to improve FEMA operations exist, they questioned President Trump’s consideration to disband it entirely by shifting to a state-based relief system.

David Sampson, president and CEO of the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), noted that “the very nature of a natural disaster means that it overwhelms the local entity’s ability to respond,” rendering any state-based solution “unworkable.”

“I think we as an industry know where the low-hanging fruit for reforms are,” Sampson continued, because “we interact with FEMA on the ground after disasters.”

State-level legislative momentum

Though the Trump administration’s current plans do not bode well for the future of disaster resilience, insurers celebrated many state legislative wins this year regarding tort reform, notably in Georgia and Louisiana.

“Even at the federal level, there is a growing sense of awareness of the negative impact that an out-of-control tort system is taking on the economy and the American consumer,” Sampson said, highlighting a new bill that would impose taxes on third-party litigation funding.

Florida also successfully resisted challenges to its 2023 and 2024 reforms, which have already helped stabilize the state’s insurance rates and attracted new insurers after a multi-year exodus. Charles Symington, president and CEO of the Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America, pointed out that industry advocacy is crucial to tort reform survival.

“Once you get these beneficial pieces of legislation passed,” he said, “we have to fight the fight in every legislative session.”

Symington then contrasted Florida’s recovering market with California’s enduringly hostile regulatory environment, propelled by the 1988 measure Proposition 103.

Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has implemented a Sustainable Insurance Strategy to mitigate the effects of Prop 103 – such as by authorizing insurers to use catastrophe modeling if they agree to offer coverage in wildfire-prone areas – but the strategy has garnered criticism from legislators and consumer groups.

“California doesn’t have the assessment ability like Florida does,” agreed moderator Fred Karlinsky, shareholder and global chair of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. “California is three decades behind.”

As insurers adjust their risk appetite to reflect these constraints, more property owners have been pushed into California’s FAIR Plan – the state’s property insurer of last resort.

“Our members are having to cobble together coverage,” said Joel Wood, president and CEO of the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers (CIAB), who noted that the FAIR plan’s policyholder count has more than doubled since 2020.

Natural disasters like January’s devastating wildfires underscore California’s need for premium rates that adequately reflect the full impact of these risks, which is essential to the continued availability of private insurance in the state.

“When you have the right leadership in place – the governor, the state legislature – and you have the industry being effective in our advocacy, then we can improve these difficult marketplaces,” Symington concluded.

Learn More:

JIF 2025: U.S. Policy Changes and Uncertainty Imperil Insurance Affordability

JIF 2025: Litigation Trends, Artificial Intelligence Take Center Stage

Insurance Affordability, Availability Demand Collaboration, Innovation

Tariff Uncertainty May Strain Insurance Markets, Challenge Affordability

Reining in Third-Party Litigation Funding Gains Traction Nationwide