The trusted source of unique, data-driven insights on insurance to inform and empower consumers. Insurance Information Institute

‘Predict and Prevent’ Insurance Model Can Restore Consumer Trust: Nationwide

home hardening

Source: Getty Images

With homeowners’ insurance replacement costs jumping 55% between 2020 and 2022 and nearly two-thirds of U.S. drivers finding auto insurance unaffordable, the personal lines insurance industry must transform from a reactive “repair-and-replace” model to a proactive “predict-and-prevent” approach to rebuild consumer trust and ensure long-term sustainability, according to a new whitepaper from Nationwide.

“With premiums on the rise, consumers have become increasingly anxious about affordability, coverage, and control. At the same time, carriers and agents are working harder than ever to retain customers in an environment where confidence is low and expectations are high,” said Casey Kempton, president of Nationwide Personal Lines and author of the report. “These challenges signal an opportunity to transform insurance in the minds of consumers. Today, we must promote a shift toward a model that encourages a predictive and preventive way of thinking amongst consumers.”

Economic and Environmental Pressures Create Perfect Storm

Three converging macro trends are fundamentally disrupting the traditional insurance model, according to Nationwide’s whitepaper. Economic uncertainty has made insurance increasingly unaffordable, with home values nearly doubling over the past decade and new automobile costs rising roughly 60% during the same period. Mortgage rates above 6% further strain household budgets, forcing consumers to make difficult choices about coverage.

Simultaneously, weather-related catastrophes are increasing in both frequency and severity. Events once considered “100-year” occurrences now happen regularly, even affecting communities previously considered low-risk. The 2024 Hurricane Helene and 2025 Guadalupe River disasters devastated non-coastal areas across multiple states, demonstrating that traditional risk zones no longer apply.

Consumer behavior has shifted in response to these pressures, according to Nationwide. Twenty percent of consumers reported delaying necessary home renovations or repairs in 2024, adopting a “spend-later” mindset that increases future risk. On the roads, 92% of consumers report an increase in aggressive and distracted driving, while 88% note more instances of reckless driving overall.

Trust Crisis Threatens Industry Sustainability

These converging trends have created what the whitepaper describes as a “broken cycle of trust” between insurers, agents and consumers. As weather events become more unpredictable and repair costs escalate, insurers struggle with predictive models and pull back from markets or tighten underwriting standards. This leads to higher premiums and reduced coverage options, causing customers to lose trust and reevaluate their coverage.

The cycle perpetuates itself as insurers experience lower customer retention and spend more on acquiring new customers rather than improving service, the whitepaper noted. In high-risk states like California and Florida, repeated disasters have led insurers to curtail coverage entirely, leaving both customers and agents scrambling for alternatives even as state regulators intervene.

The insurance industry has inadvertently trained consumers to focus on price rather than value through decades of “switch and save” advertising campaigns, according to the paper. This transactional approach has eroded the perceived value of insurance and weakened crucial relationships across the industry ecosystem.

Building Resilience Through Prevention and Partnership

The whitepaper proposes a comprehensive shift toward a predict and prevent mindset that positions insurers and agents as “assurance providers” rather than merely payers after losses occur. This transformation requires multiple stakeholders to work together on several fronts, according to Nationwide.

For technology adoption, smart home sensors can prevent water and electrical fire damage by catching issues early and alerting homeowners via smartphone. Similarly, safe driving programs using telematics provide real-time data about driving habits, helping customers build safer long-term behaviors.

Building standards represent another critical area for improvement. The whitepaper advocates for reinforcing FORTIFIED roof standards from the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), which help homes better withstand severe weather through sealed roof decks and regular inspections.

The transformation requires action from all industry participants:

  • Carriers must invest in partnerships and innovations that reduce loss while sharing data and best practices across the industry.
  • Agents and brokers need to shift from price-focused conversations to prevention-focused consultations, guiding customers toward safer choices and advocating for local safety reforms.
  • Regulators and policymakers should support new pricing models and technologies while promoting safety legislation.
  • Customers themselves must embrace insurance as protection for what matters most and adopt smart technologies that reduce risk.

“Shifting to a predict-and-prevent way of thinking helps consumers and everyone in our industry win,” Kempton said. “It can reduce losses and claims before they occur and lower premiums. It can also strengthen relationships, building the kind of customer loyalty and peace of mind that pricing alone can’t buy.”

Rebuilding Life After Violence: Why Financial Security Matters

By Loretta Worters, Vice President – Media Relations, Triple-I

When most people think about domestic violence, insurance isn’t usually top of mind. Yet, financial security and access to resources can determine whether someone in an abusive relationship can safely leave. Insurance—an essential part of financial planning—can play a critical role in helping survivors rebuild and move forward.

Each year, 10 million people are physically abused by an intimate partner, and nearly85 percent of women return to their abusers due to economic dependence, according to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV).  One of the least-discussed forms of abuse within intimate partner relationships is financial abuse. It can take many forms, limiting access to assets, concealing information, ruining credit, or sabotaging employment. These tactics are designed to control, intimidate, and entrap survivors.

Research shows that financial abuse occurs in 99 percent of domestic violence cases, and access to financial resources is the top reasons survivors remain with or return to an abuser.

The Role of Insurance in Financial Recovery

Insurance can help survivors establish independence and long-term security. From home and renters coverage to auto and life policies, insurance protects survivors and their families from financial shocks that might force them back into unsafe situations.

Triple-I encourages survivors to:

  • Secure financial records and know where they stand financially.
  • Build a financial safety net.
  • Review and, if needed, change insurance policies to ensure they are protected.
  • Maintain good credit to support long-term stability.

The Allstate Foundation’s Commitment

Since 2005, The Allstate Foundation has been a leader in addressing the financial dimensions of domestic violence. Its programs focus on financial empowerment, helping survivors gain the knowledge, tools, and confidence needed to achieve independence.

  • Moving Ahead Workbook: A five-module program guiding survivors from short-term safety to long-term security, covering financial abuse awareness, credit basics, financial foundations, and long-term planning.
  • Resources for Employers: Launched in 2025 at the Forbes Power Women Summit, Allstate’s Survivor Empowerment Network equips employers with tools to support employees experiencing abuse, recognizing that the workplace can be a critical point of intervention.

“Employers have a powerful opportunity to create a place of safety and support for survivors of domestic violence,” said Sharisse Kimbro, relationship abuse program officer at The Allstate Foundation, who spoke about the financial impact of domestic violence at the 2025 Forbes Power Women Summit stage. She noted that 8 million workdays are lost to domestic violence each year. 

Digital abuse is another growing threat. Abusers may monitor emails, texts, and social media, install spyware, or steal passwords, all of which can compound financial instability. As these risks evolve, financial literacy and insurance protections remain essential lifelines for survivors.

October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Triple-I and The Allstate Foundation are partnering to spotlight the critical role of financial empowerment and financial literacy in helping survivors build safer, more secure futures. Survivors deserve not only safety, but also the economic tools and confidence to rebuild their lives and secure a future free from abuse.

Check out these resources to learn more about the support available for survivors of domestic violence:

Despite Headwinds,
P/C Insurance Industry Maintains Course in 2025

By William Nibbelin, Senior Research Actuary, Triple-I

The U.S. property/casualty (P/C) insurance industry is on track for a second consecutive year of underwriting profitability in 2025, and is projected to grow faster than the broader U.S. economy, according to the latest Insurance Economics and Underwriting Projections: A Forward View report from Triple-I and Milliman. The report, which is based on data through the first half of 2025, highlights continued progress despite persistent geopolitical and natural catastrophe uncertainties.

Positive Economic Signals and Lingering Concerns

The industry’s economic outlook remains cautiously optimistic. According to Michel Léonard, Ph.D., CBE, chief economist and data scientist at Triple-I, the industry has benefited from stronger-than-expected underlying growth. He also noted that P/C replacement costs continue to rise more slowly than overall inflation.

However, Léonard also pointed to factors that make the outlook for 2026 especially important to watch.

 “Ongoing risks, including tariffs, labor market softening and persistent inflation,” could pose challenges, he said. While the impact of tariffs has been less severe than initially anticipated, their long-term effect remains an open question.

Underwriting Performance: A Mixed Bag

Overall underwriting profitability for 2025 is expected to be a repeat of 2024, but to a lesser degree. The performance gap between personal lines and commercial lines is narrowing.  

“Favorable second-quarter results for homeowners helped narrow the anticipated 2025 gap between personal and commercial lines performance created by the Los Angeles fires in the first quarter,” said Patrick Schmid, Ph.D., Triple-I’s chief insurance officer.

Schmid also noted that personal lines premium growth is expected to remain higher than commercial lines by one point in 2025. That difference is projected to disappear by 2027.

Personal Lines

  • Personal Auto: The personal auto sector continues to be a highlight, with its forecast 2025 Net Combined Ratio (NCR) on track for continued profitability. The forecast has also slightly improved from prior estimates.
  • Homeowners: Despite favorable results in the second quarter, the homeowners’ NCR forecast for 2025 is still expected to be unprofitable for the year.

Commercial Lines

  • General Liability: This continues to be a line of concern. According to Jason B. Kurtz, FCAS, MAAA, a principal and consulting actuary at Milliman, “We see underwriting losses continuing in 2025, with the 2025 net combined ratio for GL forecast at 107.1.” He also said that, while slight improvement is expected in 2026-2027, “we estimate GL combined ratios to remain above 100.” Kurtz added, “Direct incurred loss ratios through mid-2025 have not improved relative to 2024’s poor result. Forecasted net written premium growth of 8.0 percent is 4.8 points above 2024 as premiums respond to recent performance.”
  • Workers Compensation: In contrast to general liability, workers’ compensation remains the strongest-performing major line in the P/C industry. Preliminary 2025 results from NCCI show calendar year combined ratios in the range of 85–93 percent. Donna Glenn, Chief Actuary at NCCI, noted, “If this holds, it will represent 12 consecutive years of combined ratios under 100% for private carriers.” For more details on the preliminary Workers Comp 2025 results, see NCCI’s full analysis in 2025 in Sight, 2024 in Review: The Latest Results for Workers Compensation.

Delving Deeper: A Members-Only View

For members who want to dig deeper into the projections, the full Insurance Economics and Underwriting Projections: A Forward View report offers a more granular analysis, including:

  • A detailed look at personal auto and commercial auto results, breaking down the quarterly experience between auto liability and physical damage.
  • A forecast of net combined ratio and net written premium growth specific to farmowners insurance.
  • A comparison of commercial property sub-lines.
  • A breakdown of commercial multiple peril results, differentiating between property and liability performance.

The next quarterly report will be presented at a members-only webinar in January 2026.

Specialty Insurance Lines Trend Drivers: Inflation, Litigation, and Talent

Inflation, litigation, and talent concerns are three major drivers of the specialty-lines trends the Argo Group explores in a recent report.

Labor inflation is outpacing material costs, with U.S. labor costs rising 1.42 percent year over year, compared to 0.93 percent for materials, Argo reported. This surge in labor costs affects both claims payouts and policy pricing.

“For brokers,” Argo says, “that means underpriced risks are more vulnerable than ever.”

This trend underscores the need for actuarial precision and disciplined underwriting. Long-term profitability now hinges on the ability to anticipate inflationary impacts and adjust rates proactively.

In the construction space, tariff-driven material cost spikes make claims more costly.  Workers’ compensation – while still profitable – is feeling the bite of medical inflation.

Legal volatility is another growing concern. The Argo report cited a surge in “nuclear verdicts” — outsized jury awards that exceed actual damages – whose unpredictability makes risk pricing more complex and forces insurers to invest more heavily in legal expertise and claims discipline.

Stephen Perrella, Argo’s chief claims officer and a former trial lawyer, said, “In law school, you learn that our justice system is designed to make a plaintiff whole – no more, no less. But today…in many jurisdictions, verdicts far exceed actual damages.”

Perella pointed to states like Georgia and Florida, where outsized verdicts and systemic inefficiencies have triggered tort reform only after insurers began pulling out of the market.

“The problem is we’re implementing tort reform once those abuses have begun to overwhelm a just system,” he said.

For specialty insurers, talent constraints remain an operational risk.

“With large portions of the workforce retiring and a limited pipeline of experienced underwriters, claims professionals, and actuaries entering the field, competition for expertise is intense,” the report says. “That pressure is especially acute for carriers navigating complex risks and high-touch broker relationships.”

That means hiring the right people is only part of the solution. Argo emphasizes the need to build teams that work seamlessly together and develop talent that is ready for whatever comes next.

ClimateTech Connect NYC: You Just Had to Be There

I wrapped up my first-ever Climate Week NYC last week at ClimateTech Connect. After their two-day April event in Washington, D.C., I could hardly miss this special half-day update when it was so close to home.

Fifty-plus attendees crammed a room near Grand Central Station, and I immediately spotted familiar faces and had the opportunity to meet with a mix of industry veterans and relative newbies spanning all insurance disciplines, from underwriting and claims to the cutting edge of modeling and artificial intelligence. Top insurance thought leaders and influencers were there to speak on climate-related issues of pressing interest to my industry and everyone it serves. The panel themes and the panelist themselves made it clear from the start that a blog post was not going to do the event justice.

The first panel – Pioneers Shaping the Future of Climate Resilience – was moderated by Francis Bouchard, managing director for climate at Marsh McLennan, whose bona fides include senior positions with Zurich Insurance and the Reinsurance Association of America. Francis moderated a no-holds-barred panel of young insurance leaders: Angela Grant at Palomar, Michael Gulla of Adaptive Insurance, and Valkyrie Holmes of Faura. The energy and expertise of these panelists left me feeling that the industry – in the face of myriad challenges – is being put into good hands.

The next discussion was moderated by Jerry Theodorou, a director at the R Street Institute whose professional background includes roles at Conning, AIG, and Chubb. It featured Dan Kaniewski, managing director and U.S. public sector lead for Marsh McLennan and a former FEMA deputy administrator, and Raghuveer Vinukollu, head of climate insights and advisory for Munich Re. The depth and timeliness of these three experts’ insights made for an engaging and thought-provoking session.

The third panel was both engaging and accessible – a bit surprising to me, given that it consisted entirely of PhDs. Steve Weinstein, CEO of Mangrove Property Insurance led a discussion among Joanna Syroka of Fermat Capital Management, Catherine Ansell of JPMorgan Chase, and M. Cameron Rencurrel at Mercury Insurance on not only “Why Science Needs to Be in the Boardroom,” but HOW young scientists can find their way there and decide IF that’s where they want to be.

Between these panels were presentations from representatives of several insurtechs who shared their data-driven solutions focused on understanding and addressing climate-related panels. All this in a period of about three hours (not including the networking reception afterward). Despite all the information shared, the event did not feel at all rushed.

If you weren’t able to make it and are feeling a bit left out, don’t fret! ClimateTech Connect 2026 will be held in Washington, D.C., on April 8 and 9, 2026.

Tech — Especially A.I. —
Is Top of Mind for Global Insurance Executives

Technology trends – particularly the rise of artificial intelligence – have become the top priority for global insurance executives in 2025, according to the International Insurance Society (IIS) Global Priorities Survey.

IIS – like Triple-I, an affiliate of The Institutes – found that AI has overtaken inflation as the top priority of respondents, with two-thirds now ranking AI as their leading focus for technology and innovation. Executives cite AI’s potential to streamline operations, enhance analytics, and drive new product innovation, while inflation and climate risk remain significant concerns. Operational efficiency and cybersecurity remain high on the priority list, but the narrowing gap between climate risk and technological advancement highlights the growing influence of digital priorities.

Nearly 20,000 insurance executives worldwide participated in the 2025 survey.

“These tools enhance forecasting capabilities by allowing for deeper insights into trends and potential future risks,” on executive said, characterizing the bottom-line impact of AI. “By empowering themselves with robust analytics, organizations can improve their strategic planning and risk management efforts, ultimately driving better business outcomes.”

Beyond AI, insurance executives’ emphasis on technology generally has continued to grow. Forty-one percent of respondents now view technological advancement as a top social and environmental priority, continuing its rise from only 12 percent in 2021. This increased focus reflects a desire to harness innovations ranging from machine learning tools to sophisticated cybersecurity solutions.

Other challenges also remain top-of-mind. Inflation is the highest economic priority for the fourth consecutive year, with 63 percent of respondents citing it among their top three issues. Climate risk also continues to top the social and environmental category. Concerns over an aging workforce have almost doubled year-over-year but, generally speaking, employment issues – such as workforce readiness, workforce structure, DEI, and employee health and safety – remain lower priority issues, according to the survey.

Learn More:

JIF 2025: Litigation Trends, Artificial Intelligence Take Center Stage

JIF 2025 “Risk Takes”: Data Solutions for Today’s Challenges

Insurtech Funding Hits Seven-Year Low, Despite AI Growth

Actuarial Studies Advance Discussion on Bias, Modeling, and A.I.

Agents Skeptical of AI but Recognize Potential for Efficiency, Survey Finds

Insurers Need to Lead on Ethical Use of A.I.

Actuarial Studies Advance Discussion on Bias, Modeling, and A.I.

Study Supports Defensible Space, Home Hardening as Wildfire Resilience Tools

A recent paper published in Nature that  analyzes five major California wildfires confirms what insurers, fire scientists, and risk modelers have long asserted: Defensible space and home hardening help mitigate wildfire risk and improve resilience.

The study found that clearing vegetation and flammable materials within 1.5 meters of a structure — an area known as “Zone 0” — is one of the most effective actions a homeowner can take. When this is paired with home-hardening features like non-combustible siding, enclosed eaves, and vent screens, the results are staggering: predicted losses dropped by as much as 48 percent, according to the study.

Homes built after 1997, when California adopted stricter building codes, consistently outperformed older structures. These newer homes incorporated fire-resistant materials and design features that significantly improved survival rates.

From an insurance perspective, such steps – by leading to reduced losses and fewer, less-costly claims – can alleviate some of the upward pressure on premium rates in areas at higher risk for wildfire. In the long term, they can improve insurance affordability and availability in fire-vulnerable geographies.

Wildfire risk is strongly conditioned by geographic considerations that vary widely across and within states. A recent paper by Triple-I and Guidewire – a provider of software solutions to the insurance industry – used case studies from three California areas with very different geographic and demographic characteristics to go deeper into how such tools can be used to identify properties with attractive risk properties, despite their location in wildfire-prone areas. The use of such data-driven analysis can help insurers identify less risky properties within higher-risk geographies. 

The study in Nature examined five major fires from recent history in the wildland-urban interface (WUI) – Tubbs (2017), Thomas (2017), Camp (2018), Kincade (2019), and Glass (2020) – using machine learning to analyze on-the-ground post-fire data collection, remotely sensed data, and fire reconstruction modeling to assess patterns of loss and mitigation effectiveness.

Using a tool called an XGBoost classifier, the study found that “structure survivability can be predicted to 82 percent.” The study reported that “spacing between structures is a critical factor influencing fire risk…while fire exposure, the ignition resistance (hardening) of structures, and clearing around structures (defensible space) work in combination” to mitigate that risk.

“With the science-based information from this report, we can reduce risk and make our communities safer from wildfire,” said Janet Ruiz, Triple-I’s California-based director of strategic communication.  Accuracy of 82 percent on predictability of structures burning is a major improvement, and mitigation is the key.”

Coordinated community-wide strategies like vegetation management, building code enforcement, and distance between structures are essential. Triple-I and its members and partners are working to inform, educate, and drive behavioral change to reduce risk and build resilience.

Learn More:

Triple-I Brief Highlights Wildfire Risk Complexity

P&C Insurance Achieves Best Results Since 2013; Wildfire Losses, Tariffs Threaten 2025 Prospects

Data Granularity Key to Finding Less Risky Parcels in Wildfire Areas

California Finalizes Updated Modeling Rules, Clarifies Applicability Beyond Wildfire

Can a Fire-Prevention Device Be a “Gateway Drug” to Home Resilience?

By Lewis Nibbelin, Contributing Writer, Triple-I

Tying a fire-prevention IoT device to the distribution networks of major insurers may have cracked the code for modifying human behavior toward risk prediction and prevention, says the CEO of Whisker Labs, the producer of Ting.

Ting helps protect homes from electrical fires by using AI to detect arcing – the precursor to most electrical fires. Once connected to an outlet, Ting analyzes 30 million measurements per second to detect tiny electrical anomalies and power-quality problems. On average, Ting detects and mitigates fire hazards in 1 out of every 60 homes it protects.

Whisker Labs works with a growing community of insurers who provide Ting to their customers for free.  More than one million Tings are deployed in the United States, and approximately 50,000 are installed each month. In his second appearance on Triple-I’s Executive Exchange video series in two years, Whisker Labs founder and CEO Bob Marshall reported to Triple-I CEO Sean Kevelighan on the product’s results to date.

“One of the cool things we’ve learned over the last couple of years is that insurers have found that Ting is like the gateway drug,” Marshall said. “I mean, if you actually get Ting into your customer’s home and we deliver a great experience to them, they’re much more willing to engage in water-loss prevention after that. So, it’s really critical that the homeowners engage.”

Ease of use has been critical to Ting’s success, Marshall said, pointing out that earlier attempts at similar products were “too complicated for the customer, too complicated for the carrier, and that’s why they didn’t work. With Ting, you just plug it in and it does its thing.”

Recent research demonstrated the efficacy and value provided by Ting. In partnership with Triple-I and Octagram Analytics, Whisker Labs found that Ting resulted in 0.39 fewer electrical fire claims per 1,000 home years of experience, translating to a fire claims reduction benefit of $81 per customer per year by the third year after installation. As Whisker Labs works with its growing community of insurers to extend Ting’s reach, Marshall believes these figures could improve even further.

“What we see in that study is that the claims frequency drops dramatically in the days, weeks, and months after you plug in Ting,” Marshall said, noting that the source for this finding “is not our data – it’s data from all the carriers that we work with.”

Kevelighan agreed that “from a carrier perspective, getting more of these into the community will make the community more resilient and more insurable,” particularly within dense neighborhoods and cities where fires can spread quickly. Such settings highlight the collective responsibility of risk mitigation on consumers as well as insurers, who play a key role in disseminating prevention solutions, Kevelighan stressed.

Though more public education surrounding IoT is needed, Marshall noted that homeowners familiar with Ting’s success are often receptive to additional IoT solutions for other risks, potentially sending ripple effects of risk mitigation throughout the industry. His firm and their research collaborators aim for similar versatility with the Ting study, whose methodology has broad applicability for many types of prevention solutions.

“‘Predict and prevent’ – that’s a vision that, I think, rings true for everybody,” Marshall concluded, because “the best claim is the one that never happens. We just want to be a key part of it and help drive it.”

Learn More:

E-Mobility Battery Fire Data Exposes Potential “Blind Spot” for Insurers

IoT Solutions Offer Homeowners, Insurers Value — But How Much?

Human Needs Drive Insurance and Should Drive Tech Solutions

Predict & Prevent: From Data to Practical Insight

Beyond Fire: Triple-I Interview Unravels Lightning-Risk Complexity

As Global Risks Evolve,
So Must Insurance

By Lewis Nibbelin, Contributing Writer, Triple-I

Economic shifts, geopolitical uncertainties, cybersecurity trends, and mounting climate perils have created an increasingly severe and interconnected risk crisis, according to participants in a members-only Triple-I webinar.

In an environment constrained, for instance, by frequent natural disasters and rising replacement costs, risks no longer develop in isolation. They collide with and compound each other. Their combined impact exceeds the sum of individual risks’ effects. Such interdependence complicates identifying, let alone mitigating, the forces underpinning a specific risk.

“Under this new system that’s emerging, risk can propagate very rapidly through a host of otherwise disconnected networks,” TradeSecure president and cofounder Scott Jones told webinar host Michel Léonard, Triple-I’s Chief Economist and Data Scientist.  “This new reality fundamentally challenges the core principles that insurance has relied on for centuries.”

Jones emphasized the growing unpredictability of risk on a global scale, particularly as nations impose export controls, sanctions, investment restrictions, and tariffs for purposes like economic competition. Companies with global footprints may struggle to ascertain these interwoven, sometimes competing regulations, creating compliance concerns and potentially exacerbating supply-chain disruptions.

With the frequency and severity of U.S. cyber claims on the rise, cyberattacks also carry substantial transnational implications. Sophisticated ransomware encounters can exploit businesses of all sizes, propelling privacy liability claims and related third-party litigation.

TradeSecure vice president and cofounder Michael Beck explained how the almost universal accessibility of malware – harnessed by criminal syndicates, activist groups, or even lone hackers – presents “a new class of systemic non-physical disruption” that could undermine “the entire system’s liquidity and stability.”

“A coordinated non-state cyberattack wouldn’t just steal money – it could stop the flow of money, causing many transaction failures and possibly triggering a wave of claims far beyond what traditional cyber policies are designed to handle,” Beck said.

Though insurers as well as business owners and consumers consider cyber incidents a chief risk concern, personal cyber take-up rates remain low, with the broader cyber insurance market facing its third consecutive year of declining rates. Misunderstandings surrounding cyber risk and benefits of coverage fuel this discrepancy, revealing a gap between agent perceptions of product value and that of their customers.

Learn More:

2025 Cat Losses to Date Are 2nd-Costliest Since Records Have Been Kept

JIF 2025: U.S. Policy Changes and Uncertainty Imperil Insurance Affordability

Tariff Uncertainty May Strain Insurance Markets, Challenge Affordability

How Tariffs Affect P&C Insurance Prospects

Calls for Insurance-Price Legislation Would Hurt Policyholders, Not Help

Nonprofit to Rescue NOAA Billion-Dollar Dataset

Russia Quake Highlights Unpredictability of Natural Catastrophes

US Cyber Claims Surge While Global Rates Decline: Chubb

Personal Cyber Risk Is Up; Why Isn’t Adoption of Personal Cyber Coverage?

Calls for Insurance-Price Legislation Would Hurt Policyholders, Not Help

Increased legislative involvement in regulating homeowners’ insurance pricing and rates – as recently called for by some officials in Illinois – would hurt insurance affordability in the state, rather than helping consumers as intended, Triple-I says in its latest Issues Brief.

Rising premiums are a national issue. They reflect a combination of costly climate-related weather events, demographic trends, and rising material and labor costs to repair and replace damaged or destroyed property. Average insured catastrophe losses have been increasing for decades, fueled in part by natural disasters and population shifts into high-risk areas. More recently, these and other losses to which the property/casualty insurance industry is vulnerable were exacerbated by inflation related to the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Tariffs and changes in U.S. economic policies have since put even more upward pressure on costs.

These increasing costs – if not addressed – threaten to erode the policyholder surplus insurers are required to keep on hand to pay claims. If surplus falls below a certain level, insurers have no choice but to increase premium rates or adjust their willingness to assume risks in certain areas.

To avoid this, many insurers have filed with state regulators for rate increases – requests that often meet with resistance from consumer advocacy groups and legislators. Illinois would not be the first state to try to ease consumers’ pain by constraining insurers’ ability to accurately set coverage prices to reflect increasing levels of risk and costs.

Practicality, not politics

Such efforts, while perhaps politically popular, confuse one symptom (higher premiums) of a growing risk crisis with its underlying cause (increasing losses and rising costs). Using the blunt instrument of legislation to address the complexities and sensitivities of underwriting and pricing would tend to disrupt the market and further hurt insurance affordability – and, in some areas, availability.

Rather than target insurers with misguided legislation, the brief says, states would be wiser to work with the industry to improve their risk profiles by investing in mitigation and resilience. The brief describes the causes of higher premium rates nationally and in Illinois and how other states have successfully collaborated to address those causes and reduce upward pressure on – and eventually bring down –premium rates.

“Triple-I welcomes the opportunity to collaborate with state policymakers to develop constructive approaches to risk mitigation and resilience that will benefit communities and consumers,” the brief says.

Learn More:

Revealing Hidden Cost to Consumers of Auto Litigation Inflation

Easing Home Upkeep to Control Insurance Costs

Survey: Homeowners See Value of Aerial Imagery for Insurers; Education Key to Comfort Levels

Nonprofit to Rescue NOAA Billion-Dollar Dataset

2025 Cat Losses to Date Are 2nd-Costliest Since Records Have Been Kept

2025 Tornadoes Highlight Convective Storm Losses

Auto Premium Growth Slows as Policyholders Shop Around, Study Says

Litigation Reform Works: Florida Auto Insurance Premium Rates Declining

IoT Solutions Offer Homeowners, Insurers Value — But How Much?

Texas: A Microcosm of U.S. Climate Perils

New Illinois Bills Would Harm — Not Help — Auto Policyholders

Illinois Bill Highlights Need for Education on Risk-Based Pricing of Insurance Coverage

Hail: The “Death by 1,000 Paper Cuts” Peril

Latest research and analysis